form6ktccq104292011.htm
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 6-K
Report of Foreign Private Issuer
Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the month of April 2011
Commission File No. 1-31690
TransCanada Corporation
(Translation of Registrant's Name into English)
450 – 1 Street S.W., Calgary, Alberta, T2P 5H1, Canada
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F:
Form 20-F ¨ Form 40-F þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): ¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): ¨
Exhibits 13.1 to 13.3 to this report, furnished on Form 6-K, shall be incorporated by reference into each of the following Registration Statements under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, of the registrant: Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-5916, 333-8470, 333-9130 and 333-151736), Form F-3 (File Nos. 33-13564 and 333-6132) and Form F-10 (File Nos. 333-151781 and 333-161929).
Exhibit 99.1 to this report, furnished on Form 6-K, is furnished, not filed, and will not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement filed by the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Dated: April 29, 2011
|
TRANSCANADA CORPORATION
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Donald R. Marchand |
|
|
Donald R. Marchand
|
|
|
Executive Vice-President and
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ G. Glenn Menuz |
|
|
G. Glenn Menuz
|
|
|
Vice-President and Controller
|
13.1
|
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of the registrant as at and for the period ended March 31, 2011.
|
13.2
|
Consolidated comparative interim unaudited financial statements of the registrant for the period ended March 31, 2011 (included in the registrant's First Quarter 2011 Quarterly Report to Shareholders).
|
13.3
|
U.S. GAAP reconciliation of the consolidated comparative interim unaudited financial statements of the registrant contained in the registrant's First Quarter 2011 Quarterly Report to Shareholders.
|
31.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
31.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
32.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer regarding Periodic Report containing Financial Statements.
|
32.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer regarding Periodic Report containing Financial Statements.
|
99.1
|
A copy of the registrant’s news release of April 29, 2011.
|
exhibit131tccq104292011.htm
Exhibit 13.1
TRANSCANADA CORPORATION – FIRST QUARTER 2011
Quarterly Report to Shareholders
Management's Discussion and Analysis
Management's Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) dated April 28, 2011 should be read in conjunction with the accompanying unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements of TransCanada Corporation (TransCanada or the Company) for the three months ended March 31, 2011. In 2011, the Company will prepare its consolidated financial statements in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) as defined in Part V of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA) Handbook, which is discussed further in the Changes in Accounting Policies section in this MD&A. This MD&A should also be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto, and the MD&A contained in TransCanada's 2010 Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2010. Additional information relating to TransCanada, including the Company's Annual Information Form and other continuous disclosure documents, is available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com under TransCanada Corporation. "TransCanada" or "the Company" includes TransCanada Corporation and its subsidiaries, unless otherwise indicated. Amounts are stated in Canadian dollars unless otherwise indicated. Abbreviations and acronyms used but not otherwise defined in this MD&A are identified in the Glossary of Terms contained in TransCanada’s 2010 Annual Report.
Forward-Looking Information
This MD&A may contain certain information that is forward looking and is subject to important risks and uncertainties. The words "anticipate", "expect", "believe", "may", "should", "estimate", "project", "outlook", "forecast" or other similar words are used to identify such forward-looking information. Forward-looking statements in this document are intended to provide TransCanada security holders and potential investors with information regarding TransCanada and its subsidiaries, including management’s assessment of TransCanada’s and its subsidiaries’ future financial and operational plans and outlook. Forward-looking statements in this document may include, among others, statements regarding the anticipated business prospects, projects and financial performance of TransCanada and its subsidiaries, expectations or projections about the future, strategies and goals for growth and expansion, expected and future cash flows, costs, schedules (including anticipated construction and completion dates), operating and financial results, and expected impact of future commitments and contingent liabilities. All forward-looking statements reflect TransCanada's beliefs and assumptions based on information available at the time the statements were made. Actual results or events may differ from those predicted in these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from current expectations include, among others, the ability of TransCanada to successfully implement its strategic initiatives and whether such strategic initiatives will yield the expected benefits, the operating performance of the Company's pipeline and energy assets, the availability and price of energy commodities, capacity payments, regulatory processes and decisions, changes in environmental and other laws and regulations, competitive factors in the pipeline and energy sectors, construction and completion of capital projects, labour, equipment and material costs, access to capital markets, interest and currency exchange rates, technological developments and economic conditions in North America. By its nature, forward-looking information is subject to various risks and uncertainties, including those material risks discussed in the Financial Instruments and Risk Management section in this MD&A, which could cause TransCanada's actual results and experience to differ materially from the anticipated results or expectations expressed. Additional information on these and other factors is available in the reports filed by TransCanada with Canadian securities regulators and with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on this forward-looking information, which is given as of the date it is expressed in this MD&A or otherwise, and not to use future-oriented information or financial outlooks for anything other than their intended purpose. TransCanada undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.
TRANSCANADA [2
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
Non-GAAP Measures
TransCanada uses the measures Comparable Earnings, Comparable Earnings per Share, Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA), Comparable EBITDA, Earnings Before Interest and Taxes (EBIT), Comparable EBIT, Comparable Interest Expense, Comparable Interest Income and Other, Comparable Income Taxes and Funds Generated from Operations in this MD&A. These measures do not have any standardized meaning prescribed by Canadian GAAP. They are, therefore, considered to be non-GAAP measures and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other entities. Management of TransCanada uses these non-GAAP measures to improve its ability to compare financial results among reporting periods and to enhance its understanding of operating performance, liquidity and ability to generate funds to finance operations. These non-GAAP measures are also provided to readers as additional information on TransCanada’s operating performance, liquidity and ability to generate funds to finance operations.
EBITDA is an approximate measure of the Company’s pre-tax operating cash flow and is generally used to better measure performance and evaluate trends of individual assets. EBITDA comprises earnings before deducting interest and other financial charges, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, net income attributable to non-controlling interests and preferred share dividends. EBIT is a measure of the Company’s earnings from ongoing operations and is generally used to better measure performance and evaluate trends within each segment. EBIT comprises earnings before deducting interest and other financial charges, income taxes, net income attributable to non-controlling interests and preferred share dividends.
TRANSCANADA [3
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
Comparable Earnings, Comparable EBITDA, Comparable EBIT, Comparable Interest Expense, Comparable Interest Income and Other, and Comparable Income Taxes comprise Net Income Attributable to Common Shares, EBITDA, EBIT, Interest Expense, Interest Income and Other, and Income Taxes Expense, respectively, adjusted for specific items that are significant but are not reflective of the Company’s underlying operations in the period. Specific items are subjective, however, management uses its judgement and informed decision-making when identifying items to be excluded in calculating these non-GAAP measures, some of which may recur. Specific items may include but are not limited to certain fair value adjustments relating to risk management activities, income tax refunds and adjustments, gains or losses on sales of assets, legal and bankruptcy settlements, and write-downs of assets and investments.
The Company engages in risk management activities to reduce its exposure to certain financial and commodity price risks by utilizing instruments such as derivatives. The risk management activities which TransCanada excludes from Comparable Earnings provide effective economic hedges by locking in positive margins but do not meet the specific criteria for hedge accounting treatment and, therefore, changes in fair values are recorded in Net Income each period. The unrealized gains or losses from changes in fair value of these derivative contracts and natural gas inventory in storage are not considered to be representative of the underlying operations in the current period or the positive margin that will be realized upon settlement. As a result, these amounts have been excluded in the determination of Comparable Earnings.
The table below presents a reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to Net Income Attributable to Common Shares. Comparable Earnings per Share is calculated by dividing Comparable Earnings by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period.
Funds Generated from Operations comprise Net Cash Provided by Operations before changes in operating working capital and allows management to better measure consolidated operating cash flow, excluding fluctuations from working capital balances which may not necessarily be reflective of underlying operations in the same period. A reconciliation of Funds Generated from Operations to Net Cash Provided by Operations is presented in the Funds Generated from Operations table in the Liquidity and Capital Resources section in this MD&A.
TRANSCANADA [4
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures
For the three months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ended March 31
(unaudited)
|
|
Natural Gas Pipelines
|
|
|
Oil
Pipelines
|
|
|
Energy
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
(millions of dollars)
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparable EBITDA
|
|
|
796 |
|
|
|
768 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
1,225 |
|
|
|
1,001 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
(253 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(370 |
) |
|
|
(343 |
) |
Comparable EBIT
|
|
|
552 |
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
855 |
|
|
|
658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income Statement Items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparable interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(210 |
) |
|
|
(182 |
) |
Interest expense of joint ventures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
Comparable interest income and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Comparable income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
(118 |
) |
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
Preferred share dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
Comparable Earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specific item (net of tax):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk management activities(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
Net Income Attributable to Common Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
For the three months ended March 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)(millions of dollars except per share amounts)
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparable Interest Expense
|
|
|
(210 |
) |
|
|
(182 |
) |
Specific item:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk management activities(1)
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
(211 |
) |
|
|
(182 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparable Interest Income and Other
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Specific item:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk management activities(1)
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Interest Income and Other
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparable Income Taxes
|
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
(118 |
) |
Specific item:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes attributable to risk management activities(1)
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Income Taxes Expense
|
|
|
(178 |
) |
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparable Earnings per Share
|
|
|
$0.61 |
|
|
|
$0.48 |
|
Specific item (net of tax):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk management activities
|
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
(0.05 |
) |
Net Income per Share
|
|
|
$0.59 |
|
|
|
$0.43 |
|
(1)
|
For the three months ended March 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)(millions of dollars) |
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk Management Activities (Losses)/Gains:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Power derivatives
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
(28
|
)
|
|
Natural Gas Storage proprietary inventory and derivatives
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
(21
|
)
|
|
Interest rate derivatives
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
-
|
|
|
Foreign exchange derivatives
|
|
|
2
|
|
-
|
|
|
Income taxes attributable to risk management activities
|
|
|
7
|
|
17
|
|
|
Risk Management Activities
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
(32
|
)
|
TRANSCANADA [5
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
Consolidated Results of Operations
TransCanada’s Net Income Attributable to Controlling Interests in first quarter 2011 was $429 million and Net Income Attributable to Common Shares was $415 million or $0.59 per share compared to $303 million and $296 million or $0.43 per share, respectively, in first quarter 2010.
Comparable Earnings in first quarter 2011 were $425 million or $0.61 per share compared to $328 million or $0.48 per share for the same period in 2010. Comparable Earnings in first quarter 2011 excluded net unrealized after-tax losses of $10 million ($17 million pre-tax) (2010 – losses of $32 million after tax ($49 million pre-tax)) resulting from changes in the fair value of certain risk management activities.
Comparable Earnings increased $97 million or $0.13 per share in first quarter 2011 compared to the same period in 2010 and reflected the following:
·
|
increased Natural Gas Pipelines Comparable EBIT primarily due to higher earnings from the Alberta System, reduced business development costs and incremental earnings from Bison which was placed in service in January 2011, partially offset by the negative impact of a weaker U.S. dollar on U.S. operations;
|
=
·
|
Oil Pipelines Comparable EBIT as the Company commenced recording earnings from Keystone in first quarter 2011;
|
·
|
increased Energy Comparable EBIT primarily due to higher prices for Western Power, increased volumes and lower costs at Bruce A, and incremental earnings from the start-up of Halton Hills in September 2010 and the second phase of Kibby Wind in October 2010, partially offset by lower realized prices and volumes at Bruce B, and decreased third-party storage and proprietary natural gas revenues for Natural Gas Storage;
|
·
|
increased Comparable Interest Expense primarily due to decreased capitalized interest for Keystone, which commenced full operations in February 2011, and incremental interest expense on new debt issues in 2010, partially offset by realized losses in first quarter 2010 on derivatives used to manage the Company’s exposure to fluctuating interest rates, Canadian dollar-denomiated debt maturities and the positive impact of a weaker U.S. dollar on U.S. dollar-denominated interest expense;
|
·
|
increased Comparable Interest Income and Other, which included higher realized gains on derivatives used to manage the Company’s exposure to foreign exchange rate fluctuations on U.S. dollar-denominated income;
|
·
|
increased Comparable Income Taxes primarily due to higher pre-tax earnings; and
|
·
|
increased Preferred Share Dividends due to new preferred share issues in 2010.
|
TRANSCANADA [6
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
·
|
Further discussion of first quarter 2011 financial results is included in the Natural Gas Pipelines, Oil Pipelines, Energy and Other Income Statement Items sections in this MD&A.
|
U.S. Dollar-Denominated Balances
On a consolidated basis, the impact of changes in the value of the U.S. dollar on U.S. operations is partially offset by other U.S. dollar-denominated items as set out in the following table. The resultant pre-tax net exposure is managed using derivatives, further reducing the Company’s exposure to changes in U.S. foreign exchange rates. The average U.S. dollar exchange rate for the three months ended March 31, 2011 was 0.99 (2010 – 1.04).
Summary of Significant U.S. Dollar-Denominated Balances
(unaudited)
|
|
Three months ended March 31
|
|
(millions of U.S. dollars, pre-tax)
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Natural Gas Pipelines Comparable EBIT(1)
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
U.S. Oil Pipelines Comparable EBIT(1)
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
- |
|
U.S. Power Comparable EBIT(1)
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Interest on U.S. dollar-denominated long-term debt
|
|
|
(182 |
) |
|
|
(159 |
) |
Capitalized interest on U.S capital expenditures
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
U.S. non-controlling interests and other
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
(1)
|
Refer to the Non-GAAP Measures section in this MD&A for further discussion of Comparable EBIT.
|
TRANSCANADA [7
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
Natural Gas Pipelines’ Comparable EBIT was $552 million in first quarter 2011 compared to $515 million for the same period in 2010.
Natural Gas Pipelines Results
(unaudited)
|
|
Three months ended March 31
|
|
(millions of dollars)
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Natural Gas Pipelines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Mainline
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
265 |
|
Alberta System
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
Foothills
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
Other (TQM, Ventures LP)
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Canadian Natural Gas Pipelines Comparable EBITDA(1)
|
|
|
495 |
|
|
|
486 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(180 |
) |
|
|
(183 |
) |
Canadian Natural Gas Pipelines Comparable EBIT(1)
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Natural Gas Pipelines (in U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANR
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
GTN
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
Great Lakes(2)
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
PipeLines LP(3)(4)
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Iroquois
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Bison(5)
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Portland(4)(6)
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
International (Tamazunchale, TransGas, Gas Pacifico/INNERGY)
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
General, administrative and support costs(7)
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
Non-controlling interests(4)
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
U.S. Natural Gas Pipelines Comparable EBITDA(1)
|
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
293 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
(67 |
) |
U.S. Natural Gas Pipelines Comparable EBIT(1)
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
Foreign exchange
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
U.S. Natural Gas Pipelines Comparable EBIT(1) (in Canadian dollars)
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas Pipelines Business Development Comparable EBITDA(1)
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas Pipelines Comparable EBIT(1)
|
|
|
552 |
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas Pipelines Comparable EBITDA(1)
|
|
|
796 |
|
|
|
768 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
(253 |
) |
Natural Gas Pipelines Comparable EBIT(1)
|
|
|
552 |
|
|
|
515 |
|
(1)
|
Refer to the Non-GAAP Measures section in this MD&A for further discussion of Comparable EBITDA and Comparable EBIT.
|
(2)
|
Represents the Company’s 53.6 per cent direct ownership interest.
|
(3)
|
Represents the Company’s 38.2 per cent ownership interest.
|
(4)
|
Non-Controlling Interests reflects Comparable EBITDA for the portions of PipeLines LP and Portland not owned by TransCanada.
|
TRANSCANADA [8
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
(5)
|
Includes Bison’s operations since January 2011.
|
(6)
|
Represents the Company’s 61.7 per cent ownership interest.
|
(7)
|
Represents General, Administrative and Support Costs associated with certain of the Company’s pipelines.
|
Net Income for Wholly Owned Canadian Natural Gas Pipelines
(unaudited)
|
|
Three months ended March 31
|
|
(millions of dollars)
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Mainline
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
Alberta System
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Foothills
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Canadian Natural Gas Pipelines
Canadian Mainline’s net income in first quarter 2011 was $62 million, a decrease of $4 million from the same period in 2010. Net income in first quarter 2011 reflected a lower average investment base as well as a lower rate of return on common equity (ROE), as determined by the National Energy Board (NEB), of 8.08 per cent in 2011 compared to 8.52 per cent in 2010. The lower ROE and average investment base was partially offset by higher OM&A cost savings in 2011.
Canadian Mainline’s Comparable EBITDA in first quarter 2011 of $265 million was consistent with first quarter 2010. A decrease in revenues as a result of a lower overall return, associated with a reduced ROE and financial charges, on a reduced average investment base, was offset by a recovery of higher flow-through costs. The flow-through costs do not impact net income and increased due to higher income taxes, partially offset by the lower financial charges.
The Alberta System’s net income was $48 million in first quarter 2011 compared to $38 million in the same quarter of 2010. The increase reflected an ROE of 9.70 per cent on 40 per cent deemed common equity approved by the NEB in September 2010 as part of the Company's 2010 - 2012 Revenue Requirement Settlement application. Net income in first quarter 2010 reflected an ROE of 8.75 per cent on 35 per cent deemed common equity.
The Alberta System’s Comparable EBITDA was $185 million in first quarter 2011 compared to $175 million for the same period in 2010. The increase was primarily due to the increased ROE included in the 2010 - 2012 Revenue Requirement Settlement.
U.S. Natural Gas Pipelines
ANR’s Comparable EBITDA in first quarter 2011 was US$111 million compared to US$115 million for the same period in 2010. The decrease was primarily due to higher OM&A costs.
The Bison pipeline was placed in service in January 2011 and contributed US$13 million of EBITDA in first quarter 2011.
Comparable EBITDA for the remainder of the U.S. Natural Gas Pipelines in first quarter 2011 was US$189 million compared to US$178 million for the same period in 2010. The increase was primarily due to higher earnings from Northern Border and GTN, and lower general, administrative and support costs.
TRANSCANADA [9
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
Depreciation
Natural Gas Pipelines’ depreciation decreased $9 million in first quarter 2011 compared to the same period in 2010 primarily due to Great Lakes’ lower depreciation rate per its rate settlement, partially offset by incremental depreciation for Bison.
Business Development
Natural Gas Pipelines’ Business Development Comparable EBITDA loss decreased $15 million in first quarter 2011 compared to the same period in 2010 primarily due to an increased level of reimbursement by the State of Alaska for costs related to the Alaska Pipeline Project. The State of Alaska reimbursed up to 50 per cent of the eligible costs incurred for the Alaska Pipeline Project prior to the close of the first binding open season on July 30, 2010. Commencing July 31, 2010, the State began reimbursing up to 90 per cent of the eligible costs. Project applicable expenses and reimbursements are shared proportionately with ExxonMobil, TransCanada’s joint venture partner in developing the Alaska Pipeline Project. The decrease in business development costs was partially offset by a levy charged by the NEB in March 2011 to recover the Aboriginal Pipeline Group’s (APG) proportionate share of costs relating to the Mackenzie Gas Project (MGP) hearings.
Operating Statistics
Three months ended March 31
|
|
Canadian
Mainline(1)
|
|
|
Alberta
System(2)
|
|
|
Foothills
|
|
|
ANR(3)
|
|
|
GTN(3)
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average investment base (millions of dollars)
|
|
|
6,404 |
|
|
|
6,629 |
|
|
|
4,966 |
|
|
|
4,956 |
|
|
|
624 |
|
|
|
677 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Delivery volumes (Bcf)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
597 |
|
|
|
560 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
938 |
|
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
447 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
Average per day
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
(1)
|
Canadian Mainline’s throughput volumes in the above table reflect physical deliveries to domestic and export markets. Canadian Mainline’s physical receipts originating at the Alberta border and in Saskatchewan for the three months ended March 31, 2011 were 376 billion cubic feet (Bcf) (2010 – 385 Bcf); average per day was 4.2 Bcf (2010 – 4.3 Bcf).
|
(2)
|
Field receipt volumes for the Alberta System for the three months ended March 31, 2011 were 843 Bcf (2010 – 855 Bcf); average per day was 9.4 Bcf (2010 – 9.5 Bcf).
|
(3)
|
ANR’s and GTN’s results are not impacted by average investment base as these systems operate under fixed-rate models approved by the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
|
Oil Pipelines
In first quarter 2011, the Company recorded $76 million of Comparable EBIT related to the Keystone oil pipeline. In late January 2011, work was completed to allow the Wood River/Patoka section of the system to operate at its design pressure following the NEB’s decision to remove the maximum operating pressure restriction in December 2010. The Company commenced recording EBITDA for the Wood River/Patoka section of Keystone at the beginning of February 2011. In February 2011, the Cushing Extension was placed in service and TransCanada also began recording EBITDA related to this section of Keystone. Cash flows related to Keystone, other than general, administrative and support costs, were capitalized until the Company began recording EBITDA.
TRANSCANADA [10
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
Oil Pipelines Results
For the period February 1 to March 31
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)(millions of dollars)
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Oil Pipelines Comparable EBITDA(1)
|
|
|
35
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Canadian Oil Pipelines Comparable EBIT(1)
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Oil Pipelines Comparable EBITDA(1) (in U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
65
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
U.S. Oil Pipelines Comparable EBIT(1)
|
|
|
51
|
|
Foreign exchange
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
U.S. Oil Pipelines Comparable EBIT(1)
(in Canadian dollars)
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil Pipelines Comparable EBIT(1)
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary:
|
|
|
|
|
Oil Pipelines Comparable EBITDA(1)
|
|
|
99
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
Oil Pipelines Comparable EBIT(1)
|
|
|
76
|
|
(1)
|
Refer to the Non-GAAP Measures section in this MD&A for further discussion of Comparable EBITDA and Comparable EBIT.
|
Operating Statistics
For the period February 1 to March 31
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delivery volumes (thousands of barrels)(1):
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
22,466
|
|
Average per day
|
|
|
381
|
|
(1)
|
Delivery volumes reflect physical deliveries.
|
TRANSCANADA [11
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
Energy’s Comparable EBIT was $254 million in first quarter 2011 compared to $169 million for the same period in 2010.
Energy Results
(unaudited)
|
Three months ended March 31
|
(millions of dollars)
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Power
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Power
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
Eastern Power(1)
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
Bruce Power
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
General, administrative and support costs
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
Canadian Power Comparable EBITDA(2)
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
) |
Canadian Power Comparable EBIT(2)
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Power (in U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northeast Power(3)
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
General, administrative and support costs
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
U.S. Power Comparable EBITDA(2)
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
U.S. Power Comparable EBIT(2)
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Foreign exchange
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1 |
|
U.S. Power Comparable EBIT(2) (in Canadian dollars)
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas Storage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alberta Storage
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
General, administrative and support costs
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Natural Gas Storage Comparable EBITDA(2)
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
Natural Gas Storage Comparable EBIT(2)
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy Business Development Comparable EBITDA(2)
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy Comparable EBIT(2)
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy Comparable EBITDA(2)
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
(90 |
) |
Energy Comparable EBIT(2)
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
(1)
|
Includes Halton Hills effective September 2010.
|
(2)
|
Refer to the Non-GAAP Measures section in this MD&A for further discussion of Comparable EBITDA and Comparable EBIT.
|
(3)
|
Includes phase two of Kibby Wind effective October 2010.
|
TRANSCANADA [12
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
Western and Eastern Canadian Power Comparable EBIT(1)(2)
(unaudited)
|
Three months ended March 31
|
(millions of dollars)
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western power
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
Eastern power
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
Other(3)
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
Commodity Purchases Resold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western power
|
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
(106 |
) |
Other(4)
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
(148 |
) |
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant operating costs and other
|
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
(48 |
) |
General, administrative and support costs
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
Comparable EBITDA(1)
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
Comparable EBIT(1)
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
(1)
|
Refer to the Non-GAAP Measures section in this MD&A for further discussion of Comparable EBITDA and Comparable EBIT.
|
(2)
|
Includes Halton Hills effective September 2010.
|
(3)
|
Includes sales of excess natural gas purchased for generation and thermal carbon black. The realized gains and losses from derivatives used to purchase and sell natural gas to manage Western and Eastern Power’s assets are presented on a net basis in Other Revenues.
|
(4)
|
Includes the cost of excess natural gas not used in operations.
|
Western and Eastern Canadian Power Operating Statistics
|
|
Three months ended March 31
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Volumes (GWh)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Power
|
|
|
681 |
|
|
|
585 |
|
Eastern Power(1)
|
|
|
1,078 |
|
|
|
429 |
|
Purchased
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sundance A & B and Sheerness PPAs(2)
|
|
|
2,105 |
|
|
|
2,655 |
|
Other purchases
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
|
4,066 |
|
|
|
3,818 |
|
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contracted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Power
|
|
|
2,269 |
|
|
|
2,269 |
|
Eastern Power(1)
|
|
|
1,078 |
|
|
|
445 |
|
Spot
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Power
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
1,104 |
|
|
|
|
4,066 |
|
|
|
3,818 |
|
Plant Availability(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Power(4)
|
|
|
98 |
% |
|
|
95 |
% |
Eastern Power(1)(5)
|
|
|
99 |
% |
|
|
96 |
% |
(1)
|
Includes Halton Hills effective September 2010.
|
(2)
|
No volumes were delivered under the Sundance A PPA in 2011.
|
(3)
|
Plant availability represents the percentage of time in a period that the plant is available to generate power regardless of whether it is running.
|
(4)
|
Excludes facilities that provide power to TransCanada under PPAs.
|
(5)
|
Bécancour has been excluded from the availability calculation as power generation has been suspended since 2008.
|
TRANSCANADA [13
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
Western Power’s Comparable EBITDA of $120 million and Power Revenues of $279 million in first quarter 2011 increased $78 million and $115 million, respectively, compared to the same period in 2010, primarily due to higher overall realized power prices. Average spot market power prices in Alberta increased 104 per cent to $83 per megawatt hour (MWh) in first quarter 2011 compared to $41 per MWh in first quarter 2010 due to unseasonably cold weather combined with unplanned plant outages, which caused an increase in demand and a reduction in market supply. Western Power’s Comparable EBITDA in first quarter 2011 included $39 million of earnings from the Sundance A power purchase arrangement (PPA), the revenues and costs of which have been recorded as though Units 1 and 2 were on normal plant outages. Refer to the Recent Developments section in this MD&A for further discussion regarding the Sundance A outage.
Western Power’s Commodity Purchases Resold increased $37 million in first quarter 2011 compared to the same period in 2010 primarily due to higher volumes at Sheerness and increased retail contracts.
Eastern Power’s Comparable EBITDA of $80 million and Power Revenues of $118 million in first quarter 2011 increased $28 million and $51 million, respectively, compared to the same period in 2010. The increases were primarily due to incremental earnings from Halton Hills, which went into service in September 2010.
Plant Operating Costs and Other of $72 million in first quarter 2011, which includes fuel gas consumed in power generation, increased $24 million compared to the same period in 2010 primarily due to incremental fuel consumed at Halton Hills.
Western Power manages the sale of its supply volumes on a portfolio basis. A portion of its supply is sold into the spot market to assure supply in case of an unexpected plant outage. The overall amount of spot market volumes is dependent upon the ability to transact in forward sales markets at acceptable contract terms. This approach to portfolio management helps to minimize costs in situations where Western Power would otherwise have to purchase electricity in the open market to fulfill its contractual sales obligations. Approximately 76 per cent of Western Power sales volumes were sold under contract in first quarter 2011, compared to 67 per cent in first quarter 2010. To reduce its exposure to spot market prices on uncontracted volumes, as at March 31, 2011, Western Power had entered into fixed-price power sales contracts to sell approximately 6,300 gigawatt hours (GWh) for the remainder of 2011 and 6,800 GWh for 2012.
Eastern Power is focused on selling power under long-term contracts. In first quarter 2011 and 2010, 100 per cent of Eastern Power’s sales volumes were sold under contract and are expected to continue to be 100 per cent sold under contract for the remainder of 2011 and 2012.
TRANSCANADA [14
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
Bruce Power Results(1)
(TransCanada’s proportionate share)
(unaudited)
|
|
Three months ended March 31
|
|
(millions of dollars unless otherwise indicated)
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues(2)
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
(136 |
) |
|
|
(162 |
) |
Comparable EBITDA(1)
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bruce A Comparable EBITDA(1)
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Bruce B Comparable EBITDA(1)
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Comparable EBITDA(1)
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
Comparable EBIT(1)
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bruce Power – Other Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant availability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bruce A
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
65 |
% |
Bruce B
|
|
|
91 |
% |
|
|
98 |
% |
Combined Bruce Power
|
|
|
94 |
% |
|
|
87 |
% |
Planned outage days
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bruce A
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Bruce B
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Unplanned outage days
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bruce A
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Bruce B
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Sales volumes (GWh)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bruce A
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
989 |
|
Bruce B
|
|
|
2,032 |
|
|
|
2,155 |
|
|
|
|
3,532 |
|
|
|
3,144 |
|
Results per MWh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bruce A power revenues
|
|
|
$65 |
|
|
|
$64 |
|
Bruce B power revenues(3)
|
|
|
$53 |
|
|
|
$58 |
|
Combined Bruce Power revenues
|
|
|
$57 |
|
|
|
$60 |
|
Percentage of Bruce B output sold to spot market(4)
|
|
|
90 |
% |
|
|
78 |
% |
(1)
|
Refer to the Non-GAAP Measures section in this MD&A for further discussion of Comparable EBITDA and Comparable EBIT.
|
(2)
|
Revenues include Bruce A’s fuel cost recoveries of $8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 (2010 – $5 million).
|
(3)
|
Includes revenues received under the floor price mechanism, from contract settlements and deemed generation, and the associated volumes.
|
(4)
|
All of Bruce B’s output is covered by the floor price mechanism, including volumes sold to the spot market.
|
TransCanada’s proportionate share of Bruce A’s Comparable EBITDA increased $21 million to $34 million in first quarter 2011 as a result of higher volumes and lower operating expenses due to decreased outage days. Bruce A’s plant availability in first quarter 2011 was 100 per cent with four outage days compared to an availability of 65 per cent and 61 outage days for the same period in 2010. Results in first quarter 2010 also included the positive impact of a payment made from Bruce B to Bruce A regarding 2009 amendments to a long-term agreement with the Ontario Power Authority (OPA). The net positive impact reflected TransCanada’s higher percentage ownership interest in
Bruce A.
TransCanada’s proportionate share of Bruce B’s Comparable EBITDA decreased $7 million to $43 million in first quarter 2011 from $50 million in first quarter 2010 due to lower realized prices resulting from the expiry of fixed-price contracts at higher prices, and lower volumes and higher operating expenses due to increased outage days, partially offset by the payment made in first quarter 2010 to Bruce A regarding the 2009 amendments to a long-term agreement with the OPA. Bruce B’s plant availability in first quarter 2011 was 91 per cent with 29 outage days compared to an availability of 98 per cent and six outage days in the same period in 2010.
TRANSCANADA [15
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
Under a contract with the OPA, all output from Bruce A in first quarter 2011 was sold at a fixed price of $64.71 per MWh (before recovery of fuel costs from the OPA) compared to $64.45 per MWh in first quarter 2010. Also under a contract with the OPA, all output from the Bruce B units was subject to a floor price of $48.96 per MWh in first quarter 2011 compared to $48.76 per MWh in first quarter 2010. Both the Bruce A and Bruce B contract prices are adjusted annually for inflation on April 1. Effective April 1, 2011, the fixed price for output from Bruce A increased to $66.33 per MWh and the Bruce B floor price increased to $50.18 per MWh.
Amounts received under the Bruce B floor price mechanism within a calendar year are subject to repayment if the monthly average spot price exceeds the floor price. With respect to 2011, TransCanada currently expects spot prices to be less than the floor price for the remainder of the year, therefore, no amounts recorded in revenues in first quarter 2011 are expected to be repaid.
Bruce B enters into fixed-price contracts whereby Bruce B receives or pays the difference between the contract price and the spot price. Bruce B’s realized price decreased $5 per MWh to $53 per MWh in first quarter 2011 compared to the same period in 2010 and reflected revenues recognized from both the floor price mechanism and contract sales. The decrease was a result of the majority of higher-priced contracts entered into in previous years expiring by the end of December 2010. As the remaining contracts expire, a further reduction in realized prices at Bruce B in future periods is expected. At March 31, 2011, Bruce B had sold forward net volumes of approximately 500 GWh and 670 GWh, representing TransCanada’s proportionate share, for the remainder of 2011 and 2012, respectively.
The overall plant availability percentage in 2011 is expected to be in the mid-80s for the two operating Bruce A units and in the high 80s for the four Bruce B units. A planned maintenance outage of approximately seven weeks commenced on April 15, 2011 on Bruce B Unit 7. Bruce A expects an outage of approximately one week on Unit 3 in June 2011. For further information on Bruce Power’s planned maintenance outages, refer to the MD&A in TransCanada’s 2010 Annual Report.
As at March 31, 2011, Bruce A had incurred approximately $4.2 billion in costs for the refurbishment and restart of Units 1 and 2, and approximately $0.3 billion for the refurbishment of Units 3 and 4.
TRANSCANADA [16
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
U.S. Power
U.S. Power Comparable EBIT(1)(2)
(unaudited)
|
Three months ended March 31
|
(millions of U.S. dollars)
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Power(3)
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
Capacity
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
Other(4)
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
Commodity purchases resold
|
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
(136 |
) |
Plant operating costs and other(4)
|
|
|
(122 |
) |
|
|
(88 |
) |
General, administrative and support costs
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
Comparable EBITDA(1)
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
Comparable EBIT(1)
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
(1)
|
Refer to the Non-GAAP Measures section in this MD&A for further discussion of Comparable EBITDA and Comparable EBIT.
|
(2)
|
Includes phase two of Kibby Wind effective October 2010.
|
(3)
|
The realized gains and losses from derivatives used to purchase and sell power, natural gas and fuel oil to manage U.S. Power’s assets are presented on a net basis in Power Revenues.
|
(4)
|
Includes revenues and costs related to a third-party service agreement at Ravenswood.
|
U.S. Power Operating Statistics(1)
|
Three months ended March 31
|
(unaudited)
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Volumes (GWh)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supply
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generation
|
1,291
|
|
|
891
|
|
Purchased
|
1,939
|
|
|
2,486
|
|
|
3,230
|
|
|
3,377
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant Availability(2)(3)
|
82%
|
|
|
86%
|
|
(1)
|
Includes phase two of Kibby Wind effective October 2010.
|
(2)
|
Plant availability represents the percentage of time in a period that the plant is available to generate power regardless of whether it is running.
|
(3)
|
Plant availability decreased in the three months ended March 31, 2011 due to the impact of a planned outage at Ravenswood.
|
U.S. Power’s Power Revenues in first quarter 2011 of US$255 million increased from US$232 million in the same period in 2010 as a result of higher realized power prices and incremental revenues from the second phase of Kibby Wind which was placed in service in October 2010, partially offset by lower volumes of power sold.
Commodity Purchases Resold of US$131 million in first quarter 2011 decreased from US$136 million in the same period in 2010 primarily due to a decrease in the quantity of power purchased for resale under power sales commitments to wholesale, commercial and industrial customers in New England in first quarter 2011, partially offset by higher power prices per MWh purchased.
TRANSCANADA [17
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
Plant Operating Costs and Other, which includes fuel gas consumed in generation of US$122 million in first quarter 2011, increased US$34 million over the same period in 2010 primarily due to higher fuel costs as a result of increased generation in first quarter 2011 and reduced lease costs in first quarter 2010.
U.S. Power focuses on selling power under short- and long-term contracts to wholesale, commercial and industrial customers in the New England, New York and PJM Interconnection power markets. Exposure to fluctuations in spot prices on these power sales commitments are hedged with a combination of forward purchases of power, forward purchases of fuel to generate power and through the use of financial contracts. As at March 31, 2011, approximately 4,300 GWh or 60 per cent of U.S. Power's planned generation is contracted for the remainder of 2011. Planned generation fluctuates depending on hydrology, wind conditions, commodity prices and the resulting dispatch of the assets, and power sales fluctuate based on customer usage. The seasonal nature of the U.S. Power business generally results in higher generation volumes in the summer months.
Natural Gas Storage
Natural Gas Storage’s Comparable EBITDA in first quarter 2011 was $29 million compared to $51 million for the same period in 2010. The decrease in Comparable EBITDA in first quarter 2011 was primarily due to decreased third-party storage and proprietary natural gas revenues as a result of lower realized natural gas price spreads.
Other Income Statement Items
Comparable Interest Expense
(unaudited)
|
|
Three months ended March 31
|
|
(millions of dollars)
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on long-term debt(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian dollar-denominated
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
U.S. dollar-denominated
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
Foreign exchange
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other interest and amortization
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Capitalized interest
|
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
(134 |
) |
Comparable Interest Expense(2)
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
(1)
|
Includes interest on Junior Subordinated Notes.
|
(2)
|
Refer to the Non-GAAP Measures section in this MD&A for further discussion of Comparable Interest Expense.
|
Comparable Interest Expense in first quarter 2011 increased $28 million to $210 million from $182 million in first quarter 2010. The increase reflected decreased capitalized interest for Keystone, which commenced full operations in February 2011, and incremental interest expense on debt issues of US$1.25 billion in June 2010 and US$1.0 billion in September 2010. These increases were partially offset by Canadian dollar-denominated debt maturities in 2010 and 2011, and the positive impact of a weaker U.S. dollar on U.S. dollar-denominated interest. Comparable Interest Expense in first quarter 2010 included losses on derivatives used to manage TransCanada’s exposure to fluctuating interest rates.
TRANSCANADA [18
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
Comparable Interest Income and Other in first quarter 2011 increased $7 million to $31 million from $24 million in first quarter 2010. The increase reflected higher realized gains on derivatives used to manage the Company’s net exposure to foreign exchange rate fluctuations on U.S. dollar-denominated income.
Comparable Income Taxes were $185 million in first quarter 2011 compared to $118 million for the same period in 2010. The increase was primarily due to higher pre-tax earnings in 2011 compared to 2010.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
TransCanada’s financial position remains sound and consistent with recent years as does its ability to generate cash in the short and long term to provide liquidity, maintain financial capacity and flexibility, and provide for planned growth. TransCanada’s liquidity is underpinned by predictable cash flow from operations, cash balances on hand and unutilized committed revolving bank lines of US$1.0 billion, $2.0 billion and US$800 million, maturing in November 2011, December 2012 and December 2012, respectively. These facilities also support the Company’s commercial paper programs. In addition, at March 31, 2011, TransCanada’s proportionate share of unutilized capacity on committed bank facilities at TransCanada-operated affiliates was $113 million with maturity dates in 2011 and 2012. As at March 31, 2011, TransCanada had remaining capacity of $1.75 billion, $2.0 billion and US$1.75 billion under its equity, Canadian debt and U.S. debt shelf prospectuses, respectively. TransCanada’s liquidity, market and other risks are discussed further in the Risk Management and Financial Instruments section in this MD&A.
At March 31, 2011, the Company held Cash and Cash Equivalents of $0.6 billion compared to $0.8 billion at December 31, 2010. The decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents was primarily due to expenditures for the Company’s capital program, debt repayments and dividend payments, partially offset by increased cash generated from operations.
Operating Activities
Funds Generated from Operations(1)
(unaudited)
|
Three months ended March 31
|
(millions of dollars)
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds generated from operations(1)
|
919
|
|
|
723
|
|
Decrease in operating working capital
|
90
|
|
|
109
|
|
Net cash provided by operations
|
1,009
|
|
|
832
|
|
(1)
|
Refer to the Non-GAAP Measures section in this MD&A for further discussion of Funds Generated from Operations. |
TRANSCANADA [19
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
Net Cash Provided by Operations increased $177 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010, reflecting increased Funds Generated from Operations and changes in operating working capital. Funds Generated from Operations for the first quarter 2011 were $919 million compared to $723 million for the same period in 2010. The increase was primarily due to an increase in cash generated through earnings.
As at March 31, 2011, TransCanada’s current liabilities were $5.1 billion and current assets were $2.8 billion resulting in a working capital deficiency of $2.3 billion. Excluding $2.2 billion of Notes Payable under the Company’s commercial paper programs and draws on its line-of-credit facilities, TransCanada’s working capital deficiency was $0.1 billion. The Company believes this shortfall can be managed through its ability to generate cash flow from operations as well as its ongoing access to capital markets.
Investing Activities
TransCanada remains committed to executing its remaining $11 billion capital expenditure program. For the three months ended March 31, 2011, capital expenditures totalled $0.8 billion (2010 – $1.3 billion) primarily related to refurbishment and restart of Bruce A Units 1 and 2, Keystone, expansion of the Alberta System, and construction of the Guadalajara natural gas pipeline.
Financing Activities
In January 2011, TCPL retired $300 million of 4.3 per cent debentures.
The Company is well positioned to fund its existing capital program through its internally-generated cash flow and its continued access to capital markets. TransCanada will also continue to examine opportunities for portfolio management, including an ongoing role for PipeLines LP, in financing its capital program.
Dividends
On April 28, 2011, TransCanada's Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share for the quarter ending June 30, 2011 on the Company’s outstanding common shares. The dividend is payable on July 29, 2011 to shareholders of record at the close of business on June 30, 2011. In addition, quarterly dividends of $0.2875 and $0.25 per Series 1 and Series 3 preferred share, respectively, were declared for the quarter ending June 30, 2011. The dividends are payable on June 30, 2011 to shareholders of record at the close of business on May 31, 2011. Furthermore, a quarterly dividend of $0.275 per Series 5 preferred share was declared for the period ending July 30, 2011, payable on August 2, 2011 to shareholders of record at the close of business on June 30, 2011.
Commencing with the dividends declared April 28, 2011, common shares purchased with reinvested cash dividends under TransCanada’s Dividend Reinvestment and Share Purchase Plan (DRP) will no longer be satisfied with shares issued from treasury at a discount but rather will be acquired on the Toronto Stock Exchange at 100 per cent of the weighted average purchase price. The DRP is available for dividends payable on TransCanada’s common and preferred shares, and TCPL’s preferred shares. In the three months ended March 31, 2011, TransCanada issued 2.6 million (2010 – 2.3 million) common shares under its DRP, in lieu of making cash dividend payments of $93 million (2010 - $78 million).
TRANSCANADA [20
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
Contractual Obligations
During first quarter 2011, TransCanada had a net reduction to its purchase obligations primarily due to the settlement of its commitments in the normal course of business. There have been no other material changes to TransCanada’s contractual obligations from December 31, 2010 to March 31, 2011, including payments due for the next five years and thereafter. For further information on these contractual obligations, refer to the MD&A in TransCanada’s 2010 Annual Report.
Significant Accounting Policies and Critical Accounting Estimates
To prepare financial statements that conform with GAAP, TransCanada is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect both the amount and timing of recording assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses since the determination of these items may be dependent on future events. The Company uses the most current information available and exercises careful judgement in making these estimates and assumptions.
TransCanada's significant accounting policies and critical accounting estimates have remained unchanged since December 31, 2010. For further information on the Company’s accounting policies and estimates refer to the MD&A in TransCanada's 2010 Annual Report.
Changes in Accounting Policies
The Company’s accounting policies have not changed materially from those described in TransCanada’s 2010 Annual Report except as follows:
Changes in Accounting Policies for 2011
Business Combinations, Consolidated Financial Statements and Non-Controlling Interests
Effective January 1, 2011, the Company adopted CICA Handbook Section 1582 “Business Combinations”, which is effective for business combinations with an acquisition date after January 1, 2011. This standard was amended to require additional use of fair value measurements, recognition of additional assets and liabilities, and increased disclosure. Adopting the standard is expected to have a significant impact on the way the Company accounts for future business combinations. Entities adopting Section 1582 were also required to adopt CICA Handbook Sections 1601 “Consolidated Financial Statements” and 1602 “Non-Controlling Interests”. Sections 1601 and 1602 require Non-Controlling Interests to be presented as part of Shareholders’ Equity on the balance sheet. In addition, the income statement of the controlling parent now includes 100 per cent of the subsidiary’s results and presents the allocation of income between the controlling and non-controlling interests. Changes resulting from the adoption of Section 1582 were applied prospectively and changes resulting from the adoption of Sections 1601 and 1602 were applied retrospectively.
TRANSCANADA [21
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
Future Accounting Changes
U.S. GAAP/International Financial Reporting Standards
The CICA’s Accounting Standards Board (AcSB) previously announced that Canadian publicly accountable enterprises are required to adopt International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), effective January 1, 2011.
In accordance with GAAP, TransCanada follows specific accounting policies unique to a rate-regulated business. These rate-regulated accounting (RRA) standards allow the timing of recognition of certain revenues and expenses to differ from the timing that may otherwise be expected in a non-rate-regulated business under GAAP in order to appropriately reflect the economic impact of regulators' decisions regarding the Company's revenues and tolls.
In July 2009, the IASB issued an Exposure Draft “Rate-Regulated Activities”, which proposed a form of RRA under IFRS. At its September 2010 meeting, the IASB concluded that the development of RRA under IFRS requires further analysis and removed the RRA project from its current agenda. TransCanada does not expect a final RRA standard under IFRS to be effective in the foreseeable future.
In October 2010, the AcSB and the Canadian Securities Administrators amended their policies applicable to Canadian publicly accountable enterprises that use RRA in order to permit these entities to defer the adoption of IFRS for one year. TransCanada deferred its adoption and accordingly will continue to prepare its consolidated financial statements in 2011 in accordance with Canadian GAAP, as defined by Part V of the CICA Handbook, in order to continue using RRA.
As an SEC registrant, TransCanada prepares and files a “Reconciliation to United States GAAP” and has the option to prepare and file its consolidated financial statements using U.S. GAAP. As a result of the developments noted above, the Company’s Board of Directors have approved the adoption of U.S. GAAP effective January 1, 2012.
U.S. GAAP Conversion Project
Effective January 1, 2012, the Company will begin reporting under U.S. GAAP. TransCanada’s IFRS conversion team has been redeployed to support the conversion to U.S. GAAP. The conversion team is led by a multi-disciplinary Steering Committee that provides directional leadership for the adoption of U.S. GAAP. Management also updates TransCanada's Audit Committee on the progress of the U.S. GAAP project at each Audit Committee meeting.
TRANSCANADA [22
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
U.S. GAAP training is being provided to TransCanada staff and directors who are impacted by the conversion. Significant changes to existing systems and processes are not required to implement U.S. GAAP as the Company’s primary accounting standard since TransCanada prepares and files a “Reconciliation to United States GAAP”.
Identified differences between Canadian GAAP and U.S. GAAP that are significant to the Company are explained below and are consistent with those currently reported in the Company’s publicly-filed “Reconciliation to United States GAAP.”
Joint Ventures
Canadian GAAP requires the Company to account for certain investments using the proportionate consolidation method of accounting whereby TransCanada’s proportionate share of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and cash flows are included in the Company’s financial statements. U.S. GAAP does not permit the use of proportionate consolidation with respect to TransCanada’s joint ventures and requires that such investments be recorded using the equity method of accounting.
Inventory
Canadian GAAP allows the Company's proprietary natural gas inventory held in storage to be recorded at its fair value. Under U.S. GAAP, inventory is recorded at lower of cost or market.
Income Tax
Canadian GAAP requires that the Company record current income tax benefits resulting from substantively enacted Canadian federal income tax legislation. Under U.S. GAAP, the legislation must be fully enacted for income tax adjustments to be recorded.
Employee Benefits
Canadian GAAP requires an entity to recognize an accrued benefit asset or liability for defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans. Under U.S. GAAP, an employer is required to recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans as an asset or liability in its balance sheet and to recognize changes in the funded status through Other Comprehensive Income in the year in which the change occurs.
Debt Issue Costs
Canadian GAAP requires debt issue costs to be included in long-term debt. Under U.S. GAAP these costs are classified as deferred assets.
Financial Instruments and Risk Management
TransCanada continues to manage and monitor its exposure to counterparty credit, liquidity and market risk.
Counterparty Credit and Liquidity Risk
TransCanada’s maximum counterparty credit exposure with respect to financial instruments at the balance sheet date, without taking into account security held, consisted of accounts receivable, the fair value of derivative assets, and notes, loans and advances receivable. The carrying amounts and fair values of these financial assets, except amounts for derivative assets, are included in Accounts Receivable and Other in the Non-Derivative Financial Instruments Summary table below. Letters of credit and cash are the primary types of security provided to support these amounts. The majority of counterparty credit exposure is with counterparties who are investment grade. At March 31, 2011, there were no significant amounts past due or impaired.
TRANSCANADA [23
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
At March 31, 2011, the Company had a credit risk concentration of $297 million due from a creditworthy counterparty. This amount is expected to be fully collectible and is secured by a guarantee from the counterparty’s parent company.
The Company continues to manage its liquidity risk by ensuring sufficient cash and credit facilities are available to meet its operating and capital expenditure obligations when due, under both normal and stressed economic conditions.
Natural Gas Storage Commodity Price Risk
At March 31, 2011, the fair value of proprietary natural gas inventory held in storage, as measured using a weighted average of forward prices for the following four months less selling costs, was $49 million (December 31, 2010 - $49 million). The change in the fair value adjustment of proprietary natural gas inventory in storage in the three months ended March 31, 2011 resulted in net pre-tax unrealized gains of $2 million (2010 - losses of $24 million), which was recorded as an increase in Revenues and Inventories. The change in fair value of natural gas forward purchase and sale contracts in the three months ended March 31, 2011 resulted in net pre-tax unrealized losses of $7 million (2010 – gains of $3 million), which was included in Revenues.
VaR Analysis
TransCanada uses a Value-at-Risk (VaR) methodology to estimate the potential impact from its exposure to market risk on its liquid open positions. VaR represents the potential change in pre-tax earnings over a given holding period. It is calculated assuming a 95 per cent confidence level that the daily change resulting from normal market fluctuations in its open positions will not exceed the reported VaR. Although losses are not expected to exceed the statistically estimated VaR on 95 per cent of occasions, losses on the other five per cent of occasions could be substantially greater than the estimated VaR. TransCanada’s consolidated VaR was $14 million at March 31, 2011 (December 31, 2010 – $12 million). The increase from December 31, 2010 was primarily due to increased Alberta power forward prices as well as increased price volatility in the Alberta power market.
Net Investment in Self-Sustaining Foreign Operations
The Company hedges its net investment in self-sustaining foreign operations (on an after-tax basis) with U.S. dollar-denominated debt, cross-currency interest rate swaps, forward foreign exchange contracts and foreign exchange options. At March 31, 2011, the Company had designated as a net investment hedge U.S. dollar-denominated debt with a carrying value of $9.5 billion (US$9.8 billion) and a fair value of $10.8 billion (US$11.1 billion). At March 31, 2011, $251 million (December 31, 2010 - $181 million) was included in Intangibles and Other Assets for the fair value of forwards and swaps used to hedge the Company’s net U.S. dollar investment in foreign operations.
TRANSCANADA [24
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
The fair values and notional principal amounts for the derivatives designated as a net investment hedge were as follows:
Derivatives Hedging Net Investment in Self-Sustaining Foreign Operations
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
Asset/(Liability)
(unaudited)
(millions of dollars)
|
|
Fair
Value(1)
|
|
Notional or Principal Amount
|
|
Fair
Value(1)
|
|
Notional or Principal Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollar cross-currency swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(maturing 2011 to 2017)
|
|
|
246 |
|
US 3,150
|
|
|
179 |
|
US 2,800
|
U.S. dollar forward foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(maturing 2011)
|
|
|
5 |
|
US 550
|
|
|
2 |
|
US 100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
251 |
|
US 3,700
|
|
|
181 |
|
US 2,900
|
(1)
|
Fair values equal carrying values.
|
Non-Derivative Financial Instruments Summary
The carrying and fair values of non-derivative financial instruments were as follows:
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
(unaudited)
(millions of dollars)
|
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Assets(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
576 |
|
|
|
576 |
|
|
|
764 |
|
|
|
764 |
|
Accounts receivable and other(2)(3)
|
|
|
1,573 |
|
|
|
1,607 |
|
|
|
1,555 |
|
|
|
1,595 |
|
Available-for-sale assets(2)
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
2,174 |
|
|
|
2,208 |
|
|
|
2,339 |
|
|
|
2,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Liabilities(1)(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
2,192 |
|
|
|
2,192 |
|
|
|
2,092 |
|
|
|
2,092 |
|
Accounts payable and deferred amounts(4)
|
|
|
1,133 |
|
|
|
1,133 |
|
|
|
1,436 |
|
|
|
1,436 |
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
367 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
17,327 |
|
|
|
20,416 |
|
|
|
17,922 |
|
|
|
21,523 |
|
Junior subordinated notes
|
|
|
962 |
|
|
|
969 |
|
|
|
985 |
|
|
|
992 |
|
Long-term debt of joint ventures
|
|
|
849 |
|
|
|
944 |
|
|
|
866 |
|
|
|
971 |
|
|
|
|
22,799 |
|
|
|
25,990 |
|
|
|
23,668 |
|
|
|
27,381 |
|
(1)
|
Consolidated Net Income in first quarter 2011 included losses of $9 million (2010 – losses of $7 million) for fair value adjustments related to interest rate swap agreements on US$350 million (2010 – US$250 million) of Long-Term Debt. There were no other unrealized gains or losses from fair value adjustments to the non-derivative financial instruments.
|
(2)
|
At March 31, 2011, the Consolidated Balance Sheet included financial assets of $1,254 million (December 31, 2010 – $1,271 million) in Accounts Receivable, $38 million (December 31, 2010 – $40 million) in Other Current Assets and $306 million (December 31, 2010 - $264 million) in Intangibles and Other Assets.
|
(3)
|
Recorded at amortized cost, except for the US$350 million (December 31, 2010 – US$250 million) of Long-Term Debt that is adjusted to fair value.
|
(4)
|
At March 31, 2011, the Consolidated Balance Sheet included financial liabilities of $1,101 million (December 31, 2010 – $1,406 million) in Accounts Payable and $32 million (December 31, 2010 - $30 million) in Deferred Amounts.
|
TRANSCANADA [25
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
Derivative Financial Instruments Summary
Information for the Company’s derivative financial instruments, excluding hedges of the Company’s net investment in self-sustaining foreign operations, is as follows:
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
(all amounts in millions unless otherwise indicated)
|
|
Power
|
|
|
Natural
Gas
|
|
|
Foreign
Exchange
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Financial Instruments Held for Trading(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Values(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
$175
|
|
|
$123
|
|
|
$10
|
|
|
$17
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
$(132
|
)
|
|
$(154
|
)
|
|
$(16
|
)
|
|
$(18
|
)
|
Notional Values
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volumes(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases
|
|
21,828
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Sales
|
|
24,462
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Canadian dollars
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
836
|
|
U.S. dollars
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
US 1,839
|
|
|
US 250
|
|
Cross-currency
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
47/US 37
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized (losses)/gains in the three months ended March 31, 2011(4)
|
|
$(1
|
)
|
|
$(16
|
)
|
|
$2
|
|
|
$(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gains/(losses) in the three months ended March 31, 2011(4)
|
|
$3
|
|
|
$(26
|
)
|
|
$21
|
|
|
$2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity dates
|
2011-2015
|
|
2011-2015
|
|
2011-2012
|
|
2011-2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Financial Instruments in Hedging Relationships(5)(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Values(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
$75
|
|
|
$6
|
|
|
$-
|
|
|
$9
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
$(177
|
)
|
|
$(19
|
)
|
|
$(56
|
)
|
|
$(19
|
)
|
Notional Values
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volumes(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases
|
|
18,273
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Sales
|
|
7,906
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
U.S. dollars
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
US 120
|
|
|
US 1,000
|
|
Cross-currency
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
136/US 100
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized losses in the three months ended March 31, 2011(4)
|
|
$(38
|
)
|
|
$(3
|
)
|
|
$-
|
|
|
$(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity dates
|
|
2011-2015
|
|
2011-2013
|
|
2011- 2014
|
|
2011-2015
|
(1)
|
All derivative financial instruments in the held-for-trading classification have been entered into for risk management purposes and are subject to the Company’s risk management strategies, policies and limits. These include derivatives that have not been designated as hedges or do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment but have been entered into as economic hedges to manage the Company’s exposures to market risk.
|
(2)
|
Fair values equal carrying values.
|
(3)
|
Volumes for power and natural gas derivatives are in GWh and Bcf, respectively.
|
(4)
|
Realized and unrealized gains and losses on held-for-trading derivative financial instruments used to purchase and sell power and natural gas are included net in Revenues. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on interest rate and foreign exchange derivative financial instruments held for trading are included in Interest Expense and Interest Income and Other, respectively. The effective portion of unrealized gains and losses on derivative financial instruments in cash flow hedging relationships is initially recognized in Other Comprehensive Income and reclassified to Revenues, Interest Expense and Interest Income and Other, as appropriate, as the original hedged item settles.
|
(5)
|
All hedging relationships are designated as cash flow hedges except for interest rate derivative financial instruments designated as fair value hedges with a fair value of $9 million and a notional amount of US$350 million. Net realized gains on fair value hedges for the three months ended March 31, 2011 were $2 million and were included in Interest Expense. In first quarter 2011, the Company did not record any amounts in Net Income related to ineffectiveness for fair value hedges.
|
(6)
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2011, Net Income included losses of $3 million for changes in the fair value of power and natural gas cash flow hedges that were ineffective in offsetting the change in fair value of their related underlying positions. For the three months ended March 31, 2011, there were no gains or losses included in Net Income for discontinued cash flow hedges. No amounts have been excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness.
|
TRANSCANADA [26
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
(all amounts in millions unless otherwise indicated)
|
|
Power
|
|
|
Natural
Gas
|
|
Foreign
Exchange
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Financial Instruments Held for Trading
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Values(1)(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
$169
|
|
|
$144
|
|
|
$8
|
|
|
$20
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
$(129
|
)
|
|
$(173
|
)
|
|
$(14
|
)
|
|
$(21
|
)
|
Notional Values(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volumes(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases
|
|
15,610
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Sales
|
|
18,114
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Canadian dollars
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
736
|
|
U.S. dollars
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
US 1,479
|
|
|
US 250
|
|
Cross-currency
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
47/ US 37
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized (losses)/gains in the three months ended March 31, 2010(4)
|
|
$(16
|
)
|
|
$2
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gains/(losses) in the three months ended March 31, 2010(4)
|
|
$22
|
|
|
$(12
|
)
|
|
$8
|
|
|
$(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity dates(2)
|
|
2011-2015
|
|
2011-2015
|
|
2011-2012
|
|
2011-2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Financial Instruments in Hedging Relationships(5)(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Values(1)(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
$112
|
|
|
$5
|
|
|
$-
|
|
|
$8
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
$(186
|
)
|
|
$(19
|
)
|
|
$(51
|
)
|
|
$(26
|
)
|
Notional Values(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volumes(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases
|
|
16,071
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Sales
|
|
10,498
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
U.S. dollars
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
US 120
|
|
|
US 1,125
|
|
Cross-currency
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
136/US 100
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized losses in the three months ended March 31, 2010(4)
|
|
($7
|
)
|
|
$(3
|
)
|
|
-
|
|
|
$(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity dates(2)
|
|
2011-2015
|
|
|
2011-2013
|
|
|
2011-2014
|
|
|
2011-2015
|
|
(1)
|
Fair values equal carrying values.
|
(2)
|
As at December 31, 2010.
|
(3)
|
Volumes for power and natural gas derivatives are in GWh and Bcf, respectively.
|
(4)
|
Realized and unrealized gains and losses on held-for-trading derivative financial instruments used to purchase and sell power and natural gas are included net in Revenues. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on interest rate and foreign exchange derivative financial instruments held for trading are included in Interest Expense and Interest Income and Other, respectively. The effective portion of unrealized gains and losses on derivative financial instruments in cash flow hedging relationships is initially recognized in Other Comprehensive Income and reclassified to Revenues, Interest Expense and Interest Income and Other, as appropriate, as the original hedged item settles.
|
(5)
|
All hedging relationships are designated as cash flow hedges except for interest rate derivative financial instruments designated as fair value hedges with a fair value of $8 million and a notional amount of US$250 million at December 31, 2010. Net realized gains on fair value hedges for the three months ended March 31, 2010 were $1 million and were included in Interest Expense. In first quarter 2010, the Company did not record any amounts in Net Income related to ineffectiveness for fair value hedges.
|
(6)
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, Net Income included losses of $8 million for changes in the fair value of power and natural gas cash flow hedges that were ineffective in offsetting the change in fair value of their related underlying positions. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, there were no gains or losses included in Net Income for discontinued cash flow hedges. No amounts were excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness.
|
TRANSCANADA [27
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
Balance Sheet Presentation of Derivative Financial Instruments
The fair value of the derivative financial instruments in the Company’s Balance Sheet was as follows:
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(millions of dollars)
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(326 |
) |
|
|
(337 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangibles and other assets
|
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
374 |
|
Deferred amounts
|
|
|
(265 |
) |
|
|
(282 |
) |
Other Risks
Additional risks faced by the Company are discussed in the MD&A in TransCanada’s 2010 Annual Report. These risks remain substantially unchanged since December 31, 2010.
Controls and Procedures
As of March 31, 2011, an evaluation was carried out under the supervision of, and with the participation of management, including the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of TransCanada’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined under the rules adopted by the Canadian securities regulatory authorities and by the SEC. Based on this evaluation, the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the design and operation of TransCanada’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level as at March 31, 2011.
During the recent fiscal quarter, there have been no changes in TransCanada’s internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, TransCanada’s internal control over financial reporting.
TRANSCANADA [28
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
Outlook
Since the disclosure in TransCanada's 2010 Annual Report, the Company's earnings outlook for 2011 has improved due to higher overall realized power prices in Western Power in first quarter 2011. With the expectation of more normalized weather and additional generation capacity coming into the Alberta market, TransCanada does not expect these prices to remain at the higher first quarter levels for the remainder of 2011. For further information on outlook, refer to the MD&A in TransCanada's 2010 Annual Report.
Recent Developments
Natural Gas Pipelines
Canadian Mainline
In February 2011, the NEB approved TransCanada’s application for revised interim 2011 Canadian Mainline tolls, effective March 1, 2011. The revised interim tolls are consistent with the existing 2007-2011 settlement with two adjustments that resulted in a lower revenue requirement and therefore lower interim tolls. TransCanada is preparing an application to the NEB for approval of final rates for 2011, which it expects to file on April 29, 2011. The Company has continued discussions with shippers and other stakeholders to develop a tolling arrangement for the next several years to enhance the competitiveness of the Canadian Mainline and the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin. Unfortunately, discussions have not resulted in such an arrangement and it appears that TransCanada will be filing a comprehensive application with the NEB later in 2011 to address tolls for 2012 and beyond.
In first quarter 2011, throughput volumes and revenues were higher than projected in the 2011 interim tolls application due to colder than anticipated weather. The final revenue variance for 2011 will depend on actual throughput volumes in 2011 and an NEB decision for final 2011 costs and tolls.
TransCanada held a successful open season that closed in January 2011 and resulted in executed precedent agreements for the Canadian Mainline to transport 230,000 gigajoules per day (GJ/d) of natural gas from Marcellus shale gas reserves to eastern markets. The Company held another open season to respond to market interest in transporting additional Marcellus shale volumes on the Canadian Mainline. That open season closed April 15, 2011 and is expected to result in the transportation of an additional 150,000 GJ/d to markets east of the Parkway delivery point near Hamilton, Ontario, beginning November 1, 2013. Executed precedent agreements from these open seasons are expected to be used to support a facilities application that the Company plans to file with the NEB in third quarter 2011.
Alberta System
The Alberta System continues to operate under 2011 interim tolls approved by the NEB in 2010. TransCanada anticipates filing for final 2011 tolls in second quarter 2011 that would reflect the provisions of the Alberta System 2010 – 2012 Revenue Requirement Settlement and commercial integration of the ATCO Pipelines system. The Company expects the revised tolls to be effective in third quarter 2011.
TRANSCANADA [29
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
The Horn River natural gas pipeline project was approved by the NEB in January 2011 and commenced construction in March 2011.
The Company has executed an agreement securing contractual support for a new project to connect 100 million cubic feet per day (mmcf/d) of new natural gas supply in northeastern B.C. by 2014 with volumes expected to increase to 300 mmcf/d by 2020. This project is expected to extend the Horn River pipeline by approximately 100 kilometres (km) (62 miles) and to have an estimated capital cost of $265 million.
In addition to the Horn River project, TransCanada continues to advance further pipeline development in B.C. and Alberta to transport new natural gas supplies. The Company has filed several applications with the NEB requesting approval of further expansions of the Alberta System to accommodate requests for additional natural gas transmission service throughout the northwest portion of the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin. The total aggregate capital cost of these expansion projects is estimated to be $475 million.
PipeLines LP
On April 26, 2011, the Company announced it entered into agreements to sell a 25 per cent interest in each of Gas Transmission Northwest LLC (GTN LLC) and Bison Pipeline LLC (Bison LLC) to PipeLines LP for an aggregate purchase price of US$605 million, which includes US$81 million of long-term debt or 25 per cent of GTN LLC debt outstanding. GTN LLC and Bison LLC own the GTN and Bison natural gas pipelines, respectively. The sale is expected to close in May 2011 and is subject to certain closing conditions.
At the end of April 2011, PipeLines LP announced an underwritten public offering of 6,300,000 common units at US$47.58 per unit. Gross proceeds of approximately US$300 million from this offering will be used to partially fund the acquisition with the balance funded by a draw on PipeLines LP's committed and available US$400 million bridge loan facility and a draw on PipeLines LP’s US$250 million committed and available senior revolving credit facility. The underwriters were also granted a 30-day option to purchase an additional 945,000 common units at the same price. The offering is expected to close on May 3, 2011.
As part of this offering, TransCanada will make a capital contribution of US$6 million to maintain its two per cent general partnership interest in PipeLines LP. Assuming the underwriters exercise their option to purchase additional units, TransCanada's ownership in PipeLines LP is expected to be approximately 33.3 per cent.
Mackenzie Gas Project
In March 2011, the MGP received a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity from the NEB, marking the end of the federal regulatory process. The MGP proponents continue to seek the Canadian government’s support of an acceptable fiscal framework which would allow the project to progress. TransCanada remains committed to advancing the project.
TRANSCANADA [30
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
Guadalajara
Construction of the 305 km (190 miles) Guadalajara natural gas pipeline in Mexico was approximately 90 per cent complete as of mid-April 2011. In addition, TransCanada and the Comisión Federal de Electricidad recently executed a contract to add a compressor station to the pipeline. The total capital cost of the project, including the compressor station, is expected to be approximately US$420 million. The pipeline is expected to commence commercial operations in late second quarter 2011 and the compressor station is anticipated to be in service in early 2013.
Alaska Pipeline Project
The Alaska Pipeline Project team continues to work with shippers to resolve conditional bids received as part of the project's open season and is working toward the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) application deadline of October 2012.
Oil Pipelines
Keystone
In late January 2011, work was completed to allow the Wood River/Patoka section of the system to operate at its design pressure following the NEB’s decision to remove the maximum operating pressure restriction in December 2010. In February 2011, the Cushing Extension commenced commercial operations, extending the pipeline system to Cushing, Oklahoma and increasing nominal capacity to 591,000 Bbl/d.
TransCanada’s Keystone U.S. Gulf Coast Expansion is now entering the final stages of regulatory review. On April 15, 2011, the U.S. Department of State (DOS), the lead agency for U.S. federal regulatory approvals, issued a Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement (SDEIS) in response to comments received on a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) issued in April 2010 and to address new and additional information received. The SDEIS provides additional information on key environmental issues, but does not change the conclusion reached in the DEIS that the project would enhance U.S. energy security, benefit the U.S. economy and have limited environmental impact. The DOS has invited interested parties to comment on the SDEIS during a 45-day period, which concludes June 6, 2011. Following receipt of comments on the SDEIS and subsequent publication of a Final Environmental Impact Statement, the DOS will consult with other U.S. federal agencies during a 90-day period to determine if granting approval for the U.S. Gulf Coast Expansion is in the national interest. The DOS has indicated it will make a final decision regarding the Presidential Permit prior to the end of 2011.
The capital cost of Keystone, including the U.S. Gulf Coast Expansion, is estimated to be US$13 billion. At March 31, 2011, US$7.6 billion had been invested, including US$1.5 billion related to the U.S. Gulf Coast Expansion. The remainder is expected to be invested between now and the in-service date of the expansion, which is expected in 2013. Capital costs related to the construction of Keystone are subject to capital cost risk- and reward-sharing mechanisms with Keystone’s long-term committed shippers.
TRANSCANADA [31
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
On March 31, 2011, Keystone filed revised fixed tolls for the Wood River/Patoka section of the system with both the NEB and the FERC. The Company expects the revised tolls, which reflect the final project costs of the Wood River/Patoka section, to be effective May 1, 2011, subject to regulatory approval.
In 2010, three entities, each of which had entered into Transportation Service Agreements for the Cushing Extension, had filed separate Statements of Claim against certain of TransCanada’s Keystone subsidiaries in the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench seeking declaratory relief or, alternatively, damages in varying amounts. All of the claims have been discontinued on a without-cost and without-liability basis.
Energy
Sundance A
In December 2010, the Sundance A Units 1 and 2 were withdrawn from service for testing and were subject to a force majeure claim by TransAlta Corporation (TransAlta) in January 2011. In February 2011, TransAlta notified TransCanada that it had determined it was uneconomic to replace or repair Units 1 and 2, and that the Sundance A PPA should therefore be terminated.
TransCanada does not agree with TransAlta’s determination on either the force majeure claim or the destruction claim and has disputed both matters under the binding dispute resolution process provided in the PPA. As the limited information TransCanada has received to date does not support these claims, TransCanada continues to record revenues and costs under the PPA as though this event was a normal plant outage.
Bruce
Refurbishment work on Bruce A Units 1 and 2 continues with the connection of the refurbished Unit 2 reactor to plant systems. Plant commissioning is underway on Unit 2 and will accelerate in second quarter 2011 when construction activities are essentially complete. Fuel Channel Assembly (FCA) is underway on Unit 1, with completion expected in second quarter 2011. The installation of these FCAs is the final stage of Atomic Energy of Canada Limited's work on the reactors.
Subject to regulatory approval, Bruce Power expects to load fuel into Unit 2 in second quarter 2011 and achieve a first synchronization of the generator to the electrical grid by the end of 2011, with commercial operation expected to occur in first quarter 2012. Bruce Power expects to load fuel into Unit 1 in third quarter 2011, with a first synchronization of the generator during first quarter 2012 and commercial operation expected to occur during third quarter 2012. TransCanada's share of the total capital cost is expected to be approximately $2.4 billion of which $2.1 billion was incurred as of March 31, 2011.
TRANSCANADA [32
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
Coolidge
Construction of the US$500 million Coolidge generating station is complete. The 575 MW simple-cycle, natural gas-fired peaking power facility is expected to be placed in service on May 1, 2011.
Ravenswood
The parameters that drive U.S. Power capacity prices are reset periodically and are affected by a number of factors, including the cost of entering the market, reflected in administratively-set demand curves, available supply and fluctuations in forecast demand. With the downturn in the economy, there has been a decrease in demand that, combined with increased supply, has put downward pressure on capacity prices. On January 28, 2011, the FERC issued a decision in a rate filing made by the New York Independent System Operator (NYISO) relating to the periodic reset of the demand curves. The FERC made several determinations related to such demand curves and ordered the NYISO to make revisions in a compliance filing no later than March 29, 2011. The NYISO issued revisions to its compliance filing on March 29, 2011, to which the FERC has not yet issued a decision. While TransCanada expects the FERC's decision to result in higher demand curve price levels and to positively affect capacity prices, it is unclear what the specific impact will be until the NYISO compliance filing is fully implemented.
Oakville
In September 2009, the OPA awarded TransCanada a 20-year Clean Energy Supply contract to build, own and operate a 900 MW power generating station in Oakville, Ontario. TransCanada expected to invest approximately $1.2 billion in the natural gas-fired, combined-cycle plant. In October 2010, the Government of Ontario announced that it would not proceed with the Oakville generating station. TransCanada is negotiating a settlement with the OPA that would terminate the Clean Energy Supply contract and compensate TransCanada for the economic consequences associated with the contract’s termination.
Cartier Wind
Construction continues on the Cartier Wind project in Québec. The 58 MW Montagne-Sèche project and the 101 MW first phase of the Gros-Morne wind farm are expected to be operational in December 2011. The 111 MW second phase of Gros-Morne is expected to be operational in December 2012. These are the fourth and fifth Québec-based wind farms of Cartier Wind, which is 62 per cent owned by TransCanada. All of the 590 MW of power to be produced by Cartier Wind is sold under a 20-year power purchase arrangement to Hydro-Québec.
TRANSCANADA [33
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
Share Information
At April 26, 2011, TransCanada had 700 million issued and outstanding common shares, and had 22 million Series 1, 14 million Series 3 and 14 million Series 5 issued and outstanding first preferred shares that are convertible to 22 million Series 2, 14 million Series 4 and 14 million Series 6 preferred shares, respectively. In addition, there were nine million outstanding options to purchase common shares, of which six million were exercisable as at April 26, 2011.
Selected Quarterly Consolidated Financial Data(1)
(unaudited)
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
(millions of dollars except per share amounts)
|
|
First
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
2,243 |
|
|
|
2,057 |
|
|
|
2,129 |
|
|
|
1,923 |
|
|
|
1,955 |
|
|
|
1,986 |
|
|
|
2,049 |
|
|
|
1,984 |
|
Net income attributable to controlling interests
|
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share Statistics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share – Basic and
Diluted
|
|
|
$0.59 |
|
|
|
$0.39 |
|
|
|
$0.54 |
|
|
|
$0.41 |
|
|
|
$0.43 |
|
|
|
$0.56 |
|
|
|
$0.50 |
|
|
|
$0.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend declared per common share
|
|
|
$0.42 |
|
|
|
$0.40 |
|
|
|
$0.40 |
|
|
|
$0.40 |
|
|
|
$0.40 |
|
|
|
$0.38 |
|
|
|
$0.38 |
|
|
|
$0.38 |
|
(1)
|
The selected quarterly consolidated financial data has been prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP and is presented in Canadian dollars.
|
Factors Affecting Quarterly Financial Information
In Natural Gas Pipelines, which consists primarily of the Company's investments in regulated natural gas pipelines and regulated natural gas storage facilities, annual revenues, EBIT and TransCanada’s net income fluctuate over the long term based on regulators' decisions and negotiated settlements with shippers. Generally, quarter-over-quarter revenues and TransCanada’s net income during any particular fiscal year remain relatively stable with fluctuations resulting from adjustments being recorded due to regulatory decisions and negotiated settlements with shippers, seasonal fluctuations in short-term throughput volumes on U.S. pipelines, acquisitions and divestitures, and developments outside of the normal course of operations.
In Oil Pipelines, which consists of the Company’s investment in the Keystone crude oil pipeline, annual revenues and TransCanada’s net income are based on contracted crude oil transportation and uncommitted spot transportation. Quarter-over-quarter revenues, EBIT and TransCanada’s net income during any particular fiscal year remain relatively stable with fluctuations resulting from changes in the amount of spot volumes transported and the associated rate charged. Spot volumes transported are affected by customer demand, market pricing, planned and unplanned outages of refineries, terminals and pipeline facilities, and developments outside of the normal course of operations.
TRANSCANADA [34
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
In Energy, which consists primarily of the Company’s investments in electrical power generation plants and non-regulated natural gas storage facilities, quarter-over-quarter revenues, EBIT and TransCanada’s net income are affected by seasonal weather conditions, customer demand, market prices, capacity payments, planned and unplanned plant outages, acquisitions and divestitures, certain fair value adjustments and developments outside of the normal course of operations.
Significant developments that affected the last eight quarters' EBIT and Net Income are as follows:
·
|
First Quarter 2011, Natural Gas Pipelines’ EBIT included incremental earnings from Bison, which was placed in service in January 2011. Oil Pipelines began recording EBIT for the Wood River/Patoka and Cushing Extension sections of Keystone in February 2011. Energy’s EBIT included net unrealized losses of $18 million pre-tax ($11 million after tax) resulting from changes in the fair value of proprietary natural gas inventory in storage and certain risk management activities.
|
·
|
Fourth Quarter 2010, Natural Gas Pipelines’ EBIT decreased as a result of recording a $146 million pre-tax ($127 million after-tax) valuation provision for advances to the APG for the MGP. Energy’s EBIT included contributions from the second phase of Kibby Wind, which was placed in service in October 2010, and net unrealized gains of $22 million pre-tax ($12 million after tax) resulting from changes in the fair value of proprietary natural gas inventory in storage and certain risk management activities.
|
·
|
Third Quarter 2010, Natural Gas Pipelines’ EBIT increased as a result of recording nine months of incremental earnings related to the Alberta System 2010 – 2012 Revenue Requirement Settlement, which resulted in a $33 million increase to Net Income. Energy’s EBIT included contributions from Halton Hills, which was placed in service in September 2010, and net unrealized gains of $4 million pre-tax ($3 million after tax) resulting from changes in the fair value of proprietary natural gas inventory in storage and certain risk management activities.
|
·
|
Second Quarter 2010, Energy’s EBIT included net unrealized gains of $15 million pre-tax ($10 million after tax) resulting from changes in the fair value of proprietary natural gas inventory in storage and certain risk management activities. Net Income reflected a decrease of $58 million after tax due to losses in 2010 compared to gains in 2009 for interest rate and foreign exchange rate derivatives that did not qualify as hedges for accounting purposes and the translation of U.S. dollar-denominated working capital balances.
|
·
|
First Quarter 2010, Energy’s EBIT included net unrealized losses of $49 million pre-tax ($32 million after tax) resulting from changes in the fair value of proprietary natural gas inventory in storage and certain risk management activities.
|
TRANSCANADA [35
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
·
|
Fourth Quarter 2009, Natural Gas Pipelines EBIT included a dilution gain of $29 million pre-tax ($18 million after tax) resulting from TransCanada’s reduced ownership interest in PipeLines LP, which was caused by PipeLines LP’s issue of common units to the public. Energy’s EBIT included net unrealized gains of $7 million pre-tax ($5 million after tax) resulting from changes in the fair value of proprietary natural gas inventory in storage and certain risk management activities. Net Income included $30 million of favourable income tax adjustments resulting from reductions in the Province of Ontario’s corporate income tax rates.
|
·
|
Third Quarter 2009, Energy’s EBIT included net unrealized gains of $14 million pre-tax ($10 million after tax) due to changes in the fair value of proprietary natural gas inventory in storage and certain risk management activities.
|
·
|
Second Quarter 2009, Energy’s EBIT included net unrealized losses of $7 million pre-tax ($5 million after tax) resulting from changes in the fair value of proprietary natural gas inventory in storage and certain risk management activities. Energy’s EBIT also included contributions from Portlands Energy, which was placed in service in April 2009, and the negative impact of Western Power’s lower overall realized power prices.
|
exhibit132tccq104292011.htm
Exhibit 13.2
Consolidated Income
(unaudited)
|
Three months ended March 31
|
(millions of dollars except per share amounts)
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
2,243 |
|
|
|
1,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating and Other Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant operating costs and other
|
|
|
759 |
|
|
|
747 |
|
Commodity purchases resold
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
343 |
|
|
|
|
1,406 |
|
|
|
1,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Charges/(Income)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
Interest expense of joint ventures
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Interest income and other
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before Income Taxes
|
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Taxes Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
Future
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Attributable to Non-Controlling Interests
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
Net Income Attributable to Controlling Interests
|
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
Preferred Share Dividends
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Net Income Attributable to Common Shares
|
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income per Common Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted
|
|
|
$0.59 |
|
|
|
$0.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Common Shares Outstanding – Basic (millions)
|
|
|
698 |
|
|
|
686 |
|
Average Common Shares Outstanding – Diluted (millions)
|
|
|
699 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
TRANSCANADA [37
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
Consolidated Comprehensive Income
(unaudited)
|
|
Three months ended March 31
|
|
(millions of dollars)
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
334 |
|
Other Comprehensive (Loss)/Income, Net of Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in foreign currency translation gains and losses on investments in foreign operations(1)
|
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
(147 |
) |
Change in gains and losses on financial derivatives to hedge the net investments in foreign operations(2)
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
Change in gains and losses on derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges(3)
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
(76 |
) |
Reclassification to Net Income of gains and losses on derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges pertaining to prior periods(4)
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Other Comprehensive (Loss)/Income
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
(165 |
) |
Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income Attributable to Non-Controlling Interests
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Comprehensive Income Attributable to Controlling Interests
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
Preferred Share Dividends
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Comprehensive Income Attributable to Common Shares
|
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
(1)
|
Net of income tax expense of $29 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 (2010 – expense of $30 million).
|
(2)
|
Net of income tax expense of $19 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 (2010 – expense of $26 million).
|
(3)
|
Net of income tax recovery of $18 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 (2010 – recovery of $57 million).
|
(4)
|
Net of income tax expense of $24 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 (2010 – expense of $1 million).
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
TRANSCANADA [38
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
Consolidated Cash Flows
(unaudited)
|
|
Three months ended March 31
|
|
(millions of dollars)
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Generated From Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
334 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
343 |
|
Future income taxes
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Employee future benefits funding in excess of expense
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
Other
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
919 |
|
|
|
723 |
|
Decrease in operating working capital
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
Net cash provided by operations
|
|
|
1,009 |
|
|
|
832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(784 |
) |
|
|
(1,276 |
) |
Deferred amounts and other
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(216 |
) |
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(779 |
) |
|
|
(1,492 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends on common and preferred shares
|
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
(188 |
) |
Distributions paid to non-controlling interests
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
Notes payable issued, net
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
432 |
|
Long-term debt issued, net of issue costs
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Reduction of long-term debt
|
|
|
(321 |
) |
|
|
(141 |
) |
Long-term debt of joint ventures issued
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Reduction of long-term debt of joint ventures
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
Common shares issued
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Preferred shares issued, net of issue costs
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
339 |
|
Net cash (used in)/provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(405 |
) |
|
|
416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Foreign Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
(261 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period
|
|
|
764 |
|
|
|
997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period
|
|
|
576 |
|
|
|
736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplementary Cash Flow Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid, net of refunds
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Interest paid
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
TRANSCANADA [39
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
Consolidated Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
(millions of dollars)
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
576 |
|
|
|
764 |
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
1,254 |
|
|
|
1,271 |
|
Inventories
|
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
425 |
|
Other
|
|
|
602 |
|
|
|
777 |
|
|
|
|
2,834 |
|
|
|
3,237 |
|
Plant, Property and Equipment
|
|
|
36,113 |
|
|
|
36,244 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
3,488 |
|
|
|
3,570 |
|
Regulatory Assets
|
|
|
1,486 |
|
|
|
1,512 |
|
Intangibles and Other Assets
|
|
|
2,070 |
|
|
|
2,026 |
|
|
|
|
45,991 |
|
|
|
46,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
2,192 |
|
|
|
2,092 |
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
1,960 |
|
|
|
2,243 |
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
367 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
574 |
|
|
|
894 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt of joint ventures
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
5,126 |
|
|
|
5,661 |
|
Regulatory Liabilities
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
314 |
|
Deferred Amounts
|
|
|
689 |
|
|
|
694 |
|
Future Income Taxes
|
|
|
3,290 |
|
|
|
3,222 |
|
Long-Term Debt
|
|
|
16,753 |
|
|
|
17,028 |
|
Long-Term Debt of Joint Ventures
|
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
801 |
|
Junior Subordinated Notes
|
|
|
962 |
|
|
|
985 |
|
|
|
|
27,939 |
|
|
|
28,705 |
|
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Controlling interests
|
|
|
16,903 |
|
|
|
16,727 |
|
Non-controlling interests
|
|
|
1,149 |
|
|
|
1,157 |
|
|
|
|
18,052 |
|
|
|
17,884 |
|
|
|
|
45,991 |
|
|
|
46,589 |
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
TRANSCANADA [40
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
Consolidated Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss)/Income
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
Cash Flow
|
|
|
|
|
(millions of dollars)
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Hedges
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
(683 |
) |
|
|
(194 |
) |
|
|
(877 |
) |
Change in foreign currency translation gains and losses on investments in foreign operations(1)
|
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(98 |
) |
Change in gains and losses on financial derivatives to hedge the net investments in foreign operations(2)
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
49 |
|
Change in gains and losses on derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges(3)
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
Reclassification to Net Income of gains and losses on derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges pertaining
to prior periods(4)(5)
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
Balance at March 31, 2011
|
|
|
(732 |
) |
|
|
(204 |
) |
|
|
(936 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
(592 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(632 |
) |
Change in foreign currency translation gains and losses on investments in foreign operations(1)
|
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(147 |
) |
Change in gains and losses on financial derivatives to hedge the net investments in foreign operations(2)
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
59 |
|
Changes in gains and losses on derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges(3)
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
(77 |
) |
Reclassification to Net Income of gains and losses on derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges pertaining
to prior periods(4)
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Balance at March 31, 2010
|
|
|
(680 |
) |
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
(796 |
) |
(1)
|
Net of income tax expense of $29 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 (2010 – expense of $30 million).
|
(2)
|
Net of income tax expense of $19 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 (2010 – expense of $26 million).
|
(3)
|
Net of income tax recovery of $18 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 (2010 – recovery of $57 million).
|
(4)
|
Net of income tax expense of $24 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 (2010 – expense of $1 million).
|
(5)
|
Losses related to cash flow hedges reported in Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss)/Income and expected to be reclassified to Net Income in the next 12 months are estimated to be $86 million ($56 million, net of tax). These estimates assume constant commodity prices, interest rates and foreign exchange rates over time, however, the amounts reclassified will vary based on the actual value of these factors at the date of settlement.
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
TRANSCANADA [41
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
Consolidated Shareholders’ Equity
(unaudited)
|
|
Three months ended March 31
|
|
(millions of dollars)
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
|
11,745 |
|
|
|
11,338 |
|
Shares issued under dividend reinvestment plan
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
Shares issued on exercise of stock options
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
11,859 |
|
|
|
11,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
|
1,224 |
|
|
|
539 |
|
Shares issued under public offering, net of issue costs
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
342 |
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
1,224 |
|
|
|
881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contributed Surplus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
328 |
|
Issuance of stock options, net of exercises
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained Earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
|
4,304 |
|
|
|
4,186 |
|
Net income attributable to controlling interests
|
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
Common share dividends
|
|
|
(294 |
) |
|
|
(275 |
) |
Preferred share dividends
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
4,425 |
|
|
|
4,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss)/Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
|
(877 |
) |
|
|
(632 |
) |
Other comprehensive (loss)/income
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
(164 |
) |
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
(936 |
) |
|
|
(796 |
) |
|
|
|
3,489 |
|
|
|
3,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders’ Equity Attributable to Controlling Interests
|
|
|
16,903 |
|
|
|
16,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders’ Equity Attributable to Non-Controlling Interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
|
1,157 |
|
|
|
1,174 |
|
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PipeLines LP
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Preferred share dividends of subsidiary
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Portland
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Other comprehensive income/(loss) attributable to non-controlling interests
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Distributions to non-controlling interests
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
Other
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
1,149 |
|
|
|
1,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholders’ Equity
|
|
|
18,052 |
|
|
|
17,202 |
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
TRANSCANADA [42
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1.
|
Significant Accounting Policies
|
The consolidated financial statements of TransCanada Corporation (TransCanada or the Company) have been prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) as defined in Part V of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA) Handbook, which is discussed further in Note 2. The accounting policies applied are consistent with those outlined in TransCanada's annual audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2010. These Consolidated Financial Statements reflect all normal recurring adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary to present fairly the financial position and results of operations for the respective periods. These Consolidated Financial Statements do not include all disclosures required in the annual financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the 2010 audited Consolidated Financial Statements included in TransCanada’s 2010 Annual Report. Unless otherwise indicated, “TransCanada“ or “the Company“ includes TransCanada Corporation and its subsidiaries. Capitalized and abbreviated terms that are used but not otherwise defined herein are identified in the Glossary of Terms contained in TransCanada’s 2010 Annual Report. Amounts are stated in Canadian dollars unless otherwise indicated.
In Natural Gas Pipelines, which consists primarily of the Company's investments in regulated natural gas pipelines and regulated natural gas storage facilities, annual revenues and TransCanada’s net income fluctuate over the long term based on regulators' decisions and negotiated settlements with shippers. Generally, quarter-over-quarter revenues and TransCanada’s net income during any particular fiscal year remain relatively stable with fluctuations resulting from adjustments being recorded due to regulatory decisions and negotiated settlements with shippers, seasonal fluctuations in short-term throughput volumes on U.S. pipelines, acquisitions and divestitures, and developments outside of the normal course of operations.
In Oil Pipelines, which consists of the Company’s investment in the Keystone crude oil pipeline, annual revenues and TransCanada’s net income are based on contracted crude oil transportation and uncommitted spot transportation. Quarter-over-quarter revenues and TransCanada’s net income during any particular fiscal year remain relatively stable with fluctuations resulting from changes in the amount of spot volumes transported and the associated rate charged. Spot volumes transported are affected by customer demand, market pricing, planned and unplanned outages of refineries, terminals and pipeline facilities, and developments outside of the normal course of operations.
In Energy, which consists primarily of the Company’s investments in electrical power generation plants and non-regulated natural gas storage facilities, quarter-over-quarter revenues and TransCanada’s net income are affected by seasonal weather conditions, customer demand, market prices, capacity payments, planned and unplanned plant outages, acquisitions and divestitures, certain fair value adjustments and developments outside of the normal course of operations.
TRANSCANADA [43
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
In preparing these financial statements, TransCanada is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect both the amount and timing of recording assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses since the determination of these items may be dependent on future events. The Company uses the most current information available and exercises careful judgement in making these estimates and assumptions. In the opinion of management, these consolidated financial statements have been properly prepared within reasonable limits of materiality and within the framework of the Company’s significant accounting policies.
2.
|
Changes in Accounting Policies
|
Changes in Accounting Policies for 2011
Business Combinations, Consolidated Financial Statements and Non-Controlling Interests
Effective January 1, 2011, the Company adopted CICA Handbook Section 1582 “Business Combinations”, which is effective for business combinations with an acquisition date after January 1, 2011. This standard was amended to require additional use of fair value measurements, recognition of additional assets and liabilities, and increased disclosure. Adopting the standard is expected to have a significant impact on the way the Company accounts for future business combinations. Entities adopting Section 1582 were also required to adopt CICA Handbook Sections 1601 “Consolidated Financial Statements” and 1602 “Non-Controlling Interests”. Sections 1601 and 1602 require Non-Controlling Interests to be presented as part of Shareholders’ Equity on the balance sheet. In addition, the income statement of the controlling parent now includes 100 per cent of the subsidiary’s results and presents the allocation of income between the controlling and non-controlling interests. Changes resulting from the adoption of Section 1582 were applied prospectively and changes resulting from the adoption of Sections 1601 and 1602 were applied retrospectively.
Future Accounting Changes
U.S. GAAP/International Financial Reporting Standards
The CICA’s Accounting Standards Board (AcSB) previously announced that Canadian publicly accountable enterprises are required to adopt International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), effective January 1, 2011.
In accordance with GAAP, TransCanada follows specific accounting policies unique to a rate-regulated business. These rate-regulated accounting (RRA) standards allow the timing of recognition of certain revenues and expenses to differ from the timing that may otherwise be expected in a non-rate-regulated business under GAAP in order to appropriately reflect the economic impact of regulators' decisions regarding the Company's revenues and tolls. The IASB has concluded that the development of RRA under IFRS requires further analysis and has removed the RRA project from its current agenda. TransCanada does not expect a final RRA standard under IFRS to be effective in the foreseeable future.
TRANSCANADA [44
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
In October 2010, the AcSB and the Canadian Securities Administrators amended their policies applicable to Canadian publicly accountable enterprises that use RRA in order to permit these entities to defer the adoption of IFRS for one year. TransCanada deferred its adoption and accordingly will continue to prepare its consolidated financial statements in 2011 in accordance with Canadian GAAP, as defined by Part V of the CICA Handbook, in order to continue using RRA.
As an SEC registrant, TransCanada prepares and files a “Reconciliation to United States GAAP” and has the option to prepare and file its consolidated financial statements using U.S. GAAP. As a result of the developments noted above, the Company’s Board of Directors have approved the adoption of U.S. GAAP effective January 1, 2012.
US GAAP Conversion Project
Effective January 1, 2012, the Company will begin reporting under U.S. GAAP. The accounting policies and financial impact of adopting U.S. GAAP are consistent with that currently reported in the Company’s publicly-filed “Reconciliation to United States GAAP.” Significant changes to existing systems and processes are not required to implement U.S. GAAP as the Company’s primary accounting standard since IFRS TransCanada prepares and files a “Reconciliation to U.S. GAAP”.
TransCanada’s IFRS conversion team has been redeployed to support the conversion to U.S. GAAP. The conversion team is led by a multi-disciplinary Steering Committee that provides directional leadership for the adoption of U.S. GAAP. Management also updates TransCanada’s Audit Committee on the progress of the U.S. GAAP project at each Audit Committee meeting.
TRANSCANADA [45
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
For the three months ended
March 31
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
|
Oil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
Pipelines
|
|
|
Pipelines(1)
|
|
|
Energy
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
(millions of dollars)
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
1,129 |
|
|
|
1,129 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
979 |
|
|
|
826 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,243 |
|
|
|
1,955 |
|
Plant operating costs and other
|
|
|
(333 |
) |
|
|
(361 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(366 |
) |
|
|
(360 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(759 |
) |
|
|
(747 |
) |
Commodity purchases resold
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(277 |
) |
|
|
(256 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(277 |
) |
|
|
(256 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
(253 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(370 |
) |
|
|
(343 |
) |
|
|
|
552 |
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
837 |
|
|
|
609 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(211 |
) |
|
|
(182 |
) |
Interest expense of joint ventures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
Interest income and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(178 |
) |
|
|
(101 |
) |
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
334 |
|
Net Income Attributable to Non-Controlling Interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
Net Income Attributable to Controlling Interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
Preferred Share Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
Net Income Attributable to Common Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
(1)
|
Commencing in February 2011, TransCanada began recording earnings related to the Wood River/Patoka and Cushing Extension sections of Keystone.
|
Total Assets
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(millions of dollars)
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas Pipelines
|
|
|
23,201 |
|
|
|
23,592 |
|
Oil Pipelines
|
|
|
8,603 |
|
|
|
8,501 |
|
Energy
|
|
|
12,693 |
|
|
|
12,847 |
|
Corporate
|
|
|
1,494 |
|
|
|
1,649 |
|
|
|
|
45,991 |
|
|
|
46,589 |
|
In the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company capitalized interest related to capital projects of $97 million (2010 - $134 million).
In the three months ended March 31, 2011, TransCanada issued 2.6 million (2010 – 2.3 million) common shares under its Dividend Reinvestment and Share Purchase Plan (DRP), in lieu of making cash dividend payments of $93 million (2010 - $78 million). The dividends under the DRP were paid with common shares issued from treasury.
TRANSCANADA [46
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
6.
|
Financial Instruments and Risk Management
|
TransCanada continues to manage and monitor its exposure to counterparty credit, liquidity and market risk.
Counterparty Credit and Liquidity Risk
TransCanada’s maximum counterparty credit exposure with respect to financial instruments at the balance sheet date, without taking into account security held, consisted of accounts receivable, the fair value of derivative assets, and notes, loans and advances receivable. The carrying amounts and fair values of these financial assets, except amounts for derivative assets, are included in Accounts Receivable and Other in the Non-Derivative Financial Instruments Summary table below. Letters of credit and cash are the primary types of security provided to support these amounts. The majority of counterparty credit exposure is with counterparties who are investment grade. At March 31, 2011, there were no significant amounts past due or impaired.
At March 31, 2011, the Company had a credit risk concentration of $297 million due from a creditworthy counterparty. This amount is expected to be fully collectible and is secured by a guarantee from the counterparty’s parent company.
The Company continues to manage its liquidity risk by ensuring sufficient cash and credit facilities are available to meet its operating and capital expenditure obligations when due, under both normal and stressed economic conditions.
Natural Gas Storage Commodity Price Risk
At March 31, 2011, the fair value of proprietary natural gas inventory held in storage, as measured using a weighted average of forward prices for the following four months less selling costs, was $49 million (December 31, 2010 - $49 million). The change in the fair value adjustment of proprietary natural gas inventory in storage in the three months ended March 31, 2011 resulted in net pre-tax unrealized gains of $2 million (2010 - losses of $24 million), which was recorded as an increase in Revenues and Inventories. The change in fair value of natural gas forward purchase and sale contracts in the three months ended March 31, 2011 resulted in net pre-tax unrealized losses of $7 million (2010 – gains of $3 million), which was included in Revenues.
VaR Analysis
TransCanada uses a Value-at-Risk (VaR) methodology to estimate the potential impact from its exposure to market risk on its liquid open positions. VaR represents the potential change in pre-tax earnings over a given holding period. It is calculated assuming a 95 per cent confidence level that the daily change resulting from normal market fluctuations in its open positions will not exceed the reported VaR. Although losses are not expected to exceed the statistically estimated VaR on 95 per cent of occasions, losses on the other five per cent of occasions could be substantially greater than the estimated VaR. TransCanada’s consolidated VaR was $14 million at March 31, 2011 (December 31, 2010 – $12 million). The increase from December 31, 2010 was primarily due to increased Alberta power forward prices as well as increased price volatility in the Alberta power market.
TRANSCANADA [47
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
Net Investment in Self-Sustaining Foreign Operations
The Company hedges its net investment in self-sustaining foreign operations (on an after-tax basis) with U.S. dollar-denominated debt, cross-currency interest rate swaps, forward foreign exchange contracts and foreign exchange options. At March 31, 2011, the Company had designated as a net investment hedge U.S. dollar-denominated debt with a carrying value of $9.5 billion (US$9.8 billion) and a fair value of $10.8 billion (US$11.1 billion). At March 31, 2011, $251 million (December 31, 2010 - $181 million) was included in Intangibles and Other Assets for the fair value of forwards and swaps used to hedge the Company’s net U.S. dollar investment in foreign operations.
The fair values and notional principal amounts for the derivatives designated as a net investment hedge were as follows:
Derivatives Hedging Net Investment in Self-Sustaining Foreign Operations
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
Asset/(Liability)
(unaudited)
(millions of dollars)
|
|
Fair
Value(1)
|
|
Notional or Principal Amount
|
|
Fair
Value(1)
|
|
Notional or Principal Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollar cross-currency swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(maturing 2011 to 2017)
|
|
|
246 |
|
US 3,150
|
|
|
179 |
|
US 2,800
|
U.S. dollar forward foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(maturing 2011)
|
|
|
5 |
|
US 550
|
|
|
2 |
|
US 100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
251 |
|
US 3,700
|
|
|
181 |
|
US 2,900
|
(1)
|
Fair values equal carrying values.
|
Non-Derivative Financial Instruments Summary
The carrying and fair values of non-derivative financial instruments were as follows:
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
(unaudited)
(millions of dollars)
|
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Assets(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
576 |
|
|
|
576 |
|
|
|
764 |
|
|
|
764 |
|
Accounts receivable and other(2)(3)
|
|
|
1,573 |
|
|
|
1,607 |
|
|
|
1,555 |
|
|
|
1,595 |
|
Available-for-sale assets(2)
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
2,174 |
|
|
|
2,208 |
|
|
|
2,339 |
|
|
|
2,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Liabilities(1)(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
2,192 |
|
|
|
2,192 |
|
|
|
2,092 |
|
|
|
2,092 |
|
Accounts payable and deferred amounts(4)
|
|
|
1,133 |
|
|
|
1,133 |
|
|
|
1,436 |
|
|
|
1,436 |
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
367 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
17,327 |
|
|
|
20,416 |
|
|
|
17,922 |
|
|
|
21,523 |
|
Junior subordinated notes
|
|
|
962 |
|
|
|
969 |
|
|
|
985 |
|
|
|
992 |
|
Long-term debt of joint ventures
|
|
|
849 |
|
|
|
944 |
|
|
|
866 |
|
|
|
971 |
|
|
|
|
22,799 |
|
|
|
25,990 |
|
|
|
23,668 |
|
|
|
27,381 |
|
(1)
|
Consolidated Net Income in first quarter 2011 included losses of $9 million (2010 – losses of $7 million) for fair value adjustments related to interest rate swap agreements on US$350 million (2010 – US$250 million) of Long-Term Debt. There were no other unrealized gains or losses from fair value adjustments to the non-derivative financial instruments.
|
(2)
|
At March 31, 2011, the Consolidated Balance Sheet included financial assets of $1,254 million (December 31, 2010 – $1,271 million) in Accounts Receivable, $38 million (December 31, 2010 – $40 million) in Other Current Assets and $306 million (December 31, 2010 - $264 million) in Intangibles and Other Assets.
|
(3)
|
Recorded at amortized cost, except for the US$350 million (December 31, 2010 – US$250 million) of Long-Term Debt that is adjusted to fair value.
|
(4)
|
At March 31, 2011, the Consolidated Balance Sheet included financial liabilities of $1,101 million (December 31, 2010 – $1,406 million) in Accounts Payable and $32 million (December 31, 2010 - $30 million) in Deferred Amounts.
|
TRANSCANADA [48
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
Derivative Financial Instruments Summary
|
Information for the Company’s derivative financial instruments, excluding hedges of the Company’s net investment in self-sustaining foreign operations, is as follows:
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
(all amounts in millions unless otherwise indicated)
|
|
Power
|
|
|
Natural
Gas
|
|
|
Foreign
Exchange
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Financial Instruments Held for Trading(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Values(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
$175
|
|
|
$123
|
|
|
$10
|
|
|
$17
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
$(132
|
)
|
|
$(154
|
)
|
|
$(16
|
)
|
|
$(18
|
)
|
Notional Values
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volumes(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases
|
|
21,828
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Sales
|
|
24,462
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Canadian dollars
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
836
|
|
U.S. dollars
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
US 1,839
|
|
|
US 250
|
|
Cross-currency
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
47/US 37
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized (losses)/gains in the three months ended March 31, 2011(4)
|
|
$(1
|
)
|
|
$(16
|
)
|
|
$2
|
|
|
$(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gains/(losses) in the three months ended March 31, 2011(4)
|
|
$3
|
|
|
$(26
|
)
|
|
$21
|
|
|
$2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity dates
|
2011-2015
|
|
2011-2015
|
|
2011-2012
|
|
2011-2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Financial Instruments in Hedging Relationships(5)(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Values(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
$75
|
|
|
$6
|
|
|
$-
|
|
|
$9
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
$(177
|
)
|
|
$(19
|
)
|
|
$(56
|
)
|
|
$(19
|
)
|
Notional Values
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volumes(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases
|
|
18,273
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Sales
|
|
7,906
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
U.S. dollars
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
US 120
|
|
|
US 1,000
|
|
Cross-currency
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
136/US 100
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized losses in the three months ended March 31, 2011(4)
|
|
$(38
|
)
|
|
$(3
|
)
|
|
$-
|
|
|
$(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity dates
|
|
2011-2015
|
|
2011-2013
|
|
2011- 2014
|
|
2011-2015
|
(1)
|
All derivative financial instruments in the held-for-trading classification have been entered into for risk management purposes and are subject to the Company’s risk management strategies, policies and limits. These include derivatives that have not been designated as hedges or do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment but have been entered into as economic hedges to manage the Company’s exposures to market risk.
|
(2)
|
Fair values equal carrying values.
|
(3)
|
Volumes for power and natural gas derivatives are in gigawatt hours (GWh) and billion cubic feet (Bcf), respectively.
|
(4)
|
Realized and unrealized gains and losses on held-for-trading derivative financial instruments used to purchase and sell power and natural gas are included net in Revenues. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on interest rate and foreign exchange derivative financial instruments held for trading are included in Interest Expense and Interest Income and Other, respectively. The effective portion of unrealized gains and losses on derivative financial instruments in cash flow hedging relationships is initially recognized in Other Comprehensive Income and reclassified to Revenues, Interest Expense and Interest Income and Other, as appropriate, as the original hedged item settles.
|
(5)
|
All hedging relationships are designated as cash flow hedges except for interest rate derivative financial instruments designated as fair value hedges with a fair value of $9 million and a notional amount of US$350 million. Net realized gains on fair value hedges for the three months ended March 31, 2011 were $2 million and were included in Interest Expense. In first quarter 2011, the Company did not record any amounts in Net Income related to ineffectiveness for fair value hedges.
|
(6)
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2011, Net Income included losses of $3 million for changes in the fair value of power and natural gas cash flow hedges that were ineffective in offsetting the change in fair value of their related underlying positions. For the three months ended March 31, 2011, there were no gains or losses included in Net Income for discontinued cash flow hedges. No amounts have been excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness.
|
TRANSCANADA [49
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
(all amounts in millions unless otherwise indicated)
|
|
Power
|
|
|
Natural
Gas
|
|
Foreign
Exchange
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Financial Instruments Held for Trading
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Values(1)(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
$169
|
|
|
$144
|
|
|
$8
|
|
|
$20
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
$(129
|
)
|
|
$(173
|
)
|
|
$(14
|
)
|
|
$(21
|
)
|
Notional Values(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volumes(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases
|
|
15,610
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Sales
|
|
18,114
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Canadian dollars
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
736
|
|
U.S. dollars
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
US 1,479
|
|
|
US 250
|
|
Cross-currency
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
47/ US 37
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized (losses)/gains in the three months ended March 31, 2010(4)
|
|
$(16
|
)
|
|
$2
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gains/(losses) in the three months ended March 31, 2010(4)
|
|
$22
|
|
|
$(12
|
)
|
|
$8
|
|
|
$(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity dates(2)
|
|
2011-2015
|
|
2011-2015
|
|
2011-2012
|
|
2011-2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Financial Instruments in Hedging Relationships(5)(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Values(1)(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
$112
|
|
|
$5
|
|
|
$-
|
|
|
$8
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
$(186
|
)
|
|
$(19
|
)
|
|
$(51
|
)
|
|
$(26
|
)
|
Notional Values(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volumes(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases
|
|
16,071
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Sales
|
|
10,498
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
U.S. dollars
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
US 120
|
|
|
US 1,125
|
|
Cross-currency
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
136/US 100
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized losses in the three months ended March 31, 2010(4)
|
|
($7
|
)
|
|
$(3
|
)
|
|
-
|
|
|
$(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity dates(2)
|
|
2011-2015
|
|
|
2011-2013
|
|
|
2011-2014
|
|
|
2011-2015
|
|
(1)
|
Fair values equal carrying values.
|
(2)
|
As at December 31, 2010.
|
(3)
|
Volumes for power and natural gas derivatives are in GWh and Bcf, respectively.
|
(4)
|
Realized and unrealized gains and losses on held-for-trading derivative financial instruments used to purchase and sell power and natural gas are included net in Revenues. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on interest rate and foreign exchange derivative financial instruments held for trading are included in Interest Expense and Interest Income and Other, respectively. The effective portion of unrealized gains and losses on derivative financial instruments in cash flow hedging relationships is initially recognized in Other Comprehensive Income and reclassified to Revenues, Interest Expense and Interest Income and Other, as appropriate, as the original hedged item settles.
|
(5)
|
All hedging relationships are designated as cash flow hedges except for interest rate derivative financial instruments designated as fair value hedges with a fair value of $8 million and a notional amount of US$250 million at December 31, 2010. Net realized gains on fair value hedges for the three months ended March 31, 2010 were $1 million and were included in Interest Expense. In first quarter 2010, the Company did not record any amounts in Net Income related to ineffectiveness for fair value hedges.
|
(6)
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, Net Income included losses of $8 million for changes in the fair value of power and natural gas cash flow hedges that were ineffective in offsetting the change in fair value of their related underlying positions. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, there were no gains or losses included in Net Income for discontinued cash flow hedges. No amounts were excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness.
|
TRANSCANADA [50
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
Balance Sheet Presentation of Derivative Financial Instruments
The fair value of the derivative financial instruments in the Company’s Balance Sheet was as follows:
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(millions of dollars)
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(326 |
) |
|
|
(337 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangibles and other assets
|
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
374 |
|
Deferred amounts
|
|
|
(265 |
) |
|
|
(282 |
) |
Fair Value Hierarchy
The Company’s financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value have been categorized into three categories based on a fair value hierarchy. In Level I, the fair value of assets and liabilities is determined by reference to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities. In Level II, determination of the fair value of assets and liabilities includes valuations using inputs, other than quoted prices, for which all significant outputs are observable, directly or indirectly. This category includes fair value determined using valuation techniques, such as option pricing models and extrapolation using observable inputs. In Level III, determination of the fair value of assets and liabilities is based on inputs that are not readily observable and are significant to the overall fair value measurement. Long-dated commodity transactions in certain markets are included in this category. Long-dated commodity prices are derived with a third-party modelling tool that uses market fundamentals to derive long-term prices.
TRANSCANADA [51
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
There were no transfers between Level I and Level II in first quarter 2011 and 2010. Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value, including both current and non-current portions, are categorized as follows:
|
|
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets
(Level 1)
|
|
|
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level II)
|
|
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level III)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
(unaudited)
(millions of dollars, pre-tax)
|
|
Mar 31
2011
|
|
|
Dec 31
2010
|
|
|
Mar 31
2011
|
|
|
Dec 31
2010
|
|
|
Mar 31
2011
|
|
|
Dec 31
2010
|
|
|
Mar 31
2011
|
|
|
Dec 31
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas Inventory
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
Derivative Financial Instrument Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
Power commodity contracts
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
Natural gas commodity contracts
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
Derivative Financial Instrument Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
(65 |
) |
Power commodity contracts
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(282 |
) |
|
|
(299 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(295 |
) |
|
|
(307 |
) |
Natural gas commodity contracts
|
|
|
(140 |
) |
|
|
(178 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(169 |
) |
|
|
(193 |
) |
Non-Derivative Financial Instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale assets
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
The following table presents the net change in financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value and included in the Level III fair value category:
For the three months ended March 31
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
(millions of dollars, pre-tax)
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
New contracts(2)
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
Transfers out of Level III(3)
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Settlements
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Change in unrealized gains recorded in Net Income
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Change in unrealized (losses)/gains recorded in Other Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
(1)
|
The fair value of derivative assets and liabilities is presented on a net basis.
|
(2)
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2011, there were no amounts (2010 – loss of $1 million) included in Net Income attributable to derivatives that were entered into during the period and still held at the reporting date.
|
(3)
|
As contracts near maturity, they are transferred out of Level III and into Level II.
|
A 10 per cent increase or decrease in commodity prices, with all other variables held constant, would result in a $7 million decrease or increase, respectively, in the fair value of derivative financial instruments included in Level III and outstanding as at March 31, 2011.
TRANSCANADA [52
FIRST QUARTER REPORT 2011
6.
|
Employee Future Benefits
|
The net benefit plan expense for the Company’s defined benefit pension plans and other post-employment benefit plans is as follows:
Three months ended March 31
|
|
|
Pension Benefit Plans
|
|
Other Benefit Plans
|
|
(unaudited)(millions of dollars)
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current service cost
|
|
|
14
|
|
12
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
23
|
|
23
|
|
2
|
|
|
2
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
(27
|
)
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Amortization of net actuarial loss
|
|
|
6
|
|
2
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Amortization of past service costs
|
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net benefit cost recognized
|
|
|
16
|
|
11
|
|
2
|
|
|
2
|
|
Amounts received under the Bruce B floor price mechanism within a calendar year are subject to repayment if the monthly average spot price exceeds the floor price. No amounts recorded in revenues in the first three months of 2011 are expected to be repaid.
On April 26, 2011, the Company announced it entered into agreements to sell a 25 per cent interest in each of Gas Transmission Northwest LLC (GTN LLC) and Bison Pipeline LLC (Bison LLC) to PipeLines LP for an aggregate purchase price of US$605 million, which includes US$81 million of long-term debt or 25 per cent of GTN LLC debt outstanding. GTN LLC and Bison LLC own the GTN and Bison natural gas pipelines, respectively. The sale is expected to close in May 2011 and is subject to certain closing conditions.
At the end of April 2011, PipeLines LP announced an underwritten public offering of 6,300,000 common units at US$47.58 per unit. Gross proceeds of approximately US$300 million from this offering will be used to partially fund the acquisition with the balance funded by a draw on PipeLines LP’s committed and available US$400 million bridge loan facility and a draw on PipeLines LP's US$250 million committed and available senior revolving credit facility. The underwriters were also granted a 30-day option to purchase an additional 945,000 common units at the same price. The offering is expected to close on May 3, 2011.
As part of this offering, TransCanada will make a capital contribution of US$6 million to maintain its two per cent general partnership interest in PipeLines LP. Assuming the underwriters exercise their option to purchase additional units, TransCanada's ownership in PipeLines LP is expected to be approximately 33.3 per cent.
|
TransCanada welcomes questions from shareholders and potential investors. Please telephone:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investor Relations, at (800) 361-6522 (Canada and U.S. Mainland) or direct dial David Moneta/ Terry Hook at (403) 920-7911. The investor fax line is (403) 920-2457. Media Relations: Terry Cunha/Shawn Howard (403) 920-7859 or (800) 608-7859.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visit the TransCanada website at: www.transcanada.com.
|
|
exhibit133tccq104292011.htm
TRANSCANADA CORPORATION
RECONCILIATION TO UNITED STATES GAAP
March 31, 2011
TRANSCANADA CORPORATION
RECONCILIATION TO UNITED STATES GAAP
The unaudited consolidated financial statements of TransCanada Corporation (TransCanada or the Company) for the three months ended March 31, 2011 have been prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), as defined by Part V of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants Handbook, which, in some respects, differ from United States (U.S.) GAAP.
The effects of significant differences between Canadian and U.S. GAAP on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2011 are described below and should be read in conjunction with TransCanada’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010, and TransCanada’s U.S. GAAP reconciliation for the year ended December 31, 2010 and TransCanada’s unaudited consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2011 prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP.
Reconciliation of Net Income and Comprehensive Income
(unaudited)
|
|
Three months ended March 31
|
|
(millions of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts)
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Net Income in Accordance with Canadian GAAP
|
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
334 |
|
U.S. GAAP adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (gain)/loss on natural gas inventory held in storage(1)
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
24 |
|
Tax impact of unrealized (gain)/loss on natural gas inventory held in storage
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
Tax recovery due to a change in tax legislation not fully enacted(2)
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Net Income in Accordance with U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
Less: net income attributable to non-controlling interests
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
Net Income Attributable to Controlling Interests
|
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
Less: preferred share dividends
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders in Accordance with U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Comprehensive (Loss)/Income in Accordance with Canadian GAAP
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
(165 |
) |
U.S. GAAP adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in funded status of postretirement plan liability(3)
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Change in equity investment funded status of postretirement plan liability
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Other Comprehensive Loss in Accordance with U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(163 |
) |
Less: other comprehensive (income)/loss attributable to non-controlling interests
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
Other Comprehensive Loss Attributable to Controlling Interests in Accordance with U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
(162 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income Attributable to Controlling Interests in Accordance with U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income per Share in Accordance with U.S. GAAP, Basic and Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Balance Sheet in Accordance with U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
(millions of Canadian dollars)
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
Current assets(1)(4)
|
|
|
2,324 |
|
|
|
2,711 |
|
Long-term investments(4)
|
|
|
4,875 |
|
|
|
4,775 |
|
Plant, property and equipment(4)
|
|
|
30,788 |
|
|
|
30,987 |
|
Goodwill(4)
|
|
|
3,378 |
|
|
|
3,457 |
|
Regulatory assets(3)(4)
|
|
|
1,660 |
|
|
|
1,699 |
|
Intangibles and other assets (3)(4)(5)
|
|
|
1,517 |
|
|
|
1,512 |
|
|
|
|
44,542 |
|
|
|
45,141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities(2)(4)
|
|
|
4,758 |
|
|
|
5,316 |
|
Deferred amounts(3)(4)
|
|
|
727 |
|
|
|
728 |
|
Regulatory liabilities(4)
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
308 |
|
Deferred income taxes(1)(3)(4)
|
|
|
3,239 |
|
|
|
3,169 |
|
Long-term debt and junior subordinated notes(4)(5)
|
|
|
17,815 |
|
|
|
18,115 |
|
|
|
|
26,867 |
|
|
|
27,636 |
|
Shareholders’ equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
11,859 |
|
|
|
11,745 |
|
Preferred shares
|
|
|
1,224 |
|
|
|
1,224 |
|
Non-controlling interests
|
|
|
1,149 |
|
|
|
1,157 |
|
Contributed surplus
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
Retained earnings(1)(2)
|
|
|
4,390 |
|
|
|
4,273 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss)/income(3)(6)
|
|
|
(1,296 |
) |
|
|
(1,243 |
) |
|
|
|
17,675 |
|
|
|
17,505 |
|
|
|
|
44,542 |
|
|
|
45,141 |
|
(1)
|
In accordance with Canadian GAAP, natural gas inventory held in storage is recorded at its fair value. Under U.S. GAAP, inventory is recorded at lower of cost or market.
|
(2)
|
In accordance with Canadian GAAP, the Company recorded current income tax benefits resulting from substantively enacted Canadian federal income tax legislation. Under U.S. GAAP, the legislation must be fully enacted for income tax adjustments to be recorded.
|
(3)
|
Represents the amortization of net loss and prior service cost amounts recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss)/Income (AOCI) for the Company’s defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans that have been previously recorded under U.S. GAAP.
|
(4)
|
Under Canadian GAAP, the Company accounts for certain investments using the proportionate consolidation basis of accounting whereby the Company’s proportionate share of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and cash flows are included in the Company’s financial statements. U.S. GAAP does not allow the use of proportionate consolidation and requires that such investments be recorded on an equity accounting basis. Information on the balances that have been proportionately consolidated is located in Note 8 to the Company’s Canadian GAAP audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010.
|
As a consequence of using equity accounting for certain of these joint ventures under U.S. GAAP, the Company is required to reflect an additional liability of $137 million at March 31, 2011 (December 31, 2010 - $150 million) for certain guarantees related to debt and other performance commitments of the joint venture operations that were not required to be recorded when the underlying liability was reflected on the balance sheet under the proportionate consolidation method of accounting.
U.S. GAAP requires the disclosure of the difference, if any, between the carrying value of the investment and the investor’s underlying equity in the net assets of the investee on an ongoing basis, rather than only at the date of purchase as required under Canadian GAAP. At March 31, 2011 the Company has a US$121 million (December 31, 2010-US$121 million) difference between the carrying value of Northern Border Pipeline Company (Northern Border) and the underlying equity in the net assets primarily as a result of goodwill recognized from TC PipeLines, LP’s April 2006 acquisition of an additional 20 per cent general partnership interest in Northern Border.
(5)
|
In accordance with U.S. GAAP, debt issue costs are recorded as a deferred asset rather than being included in Long-Term Debt as required by Canadian GAAP. |
(6)
|
At March 31, 2011, AOCI in accordance with U.S. GAAP is $360 million higher than under Canadian GAAP. The difference relates to the accounting treatment for defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans. At March 31, 2011, AOCI attributable to NCI of $8 million (December 31, 2010 - $11 million) is included in NCI.
|
Hedging Instruments and Activities
U.S. GAAP disclosures regarding derivatives are intended to provide additional information about the effect derivatives and hedging activities have on an entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. Much of the disclosure is provided in the Company’s unaudited consolidated financial statements at March 31, 2011 and audited consolidated annual financial statements at December 31, 2010 prepared under Canadian GAAP. Additional required information is provided below.
Derivatives in Cash Flow and Net Investment Hedging Relationships
|
Cash Flow Hedges
|
Net Investment Hedges
|
Three months ended March 31
|
Power
|
Natural
Gas
|
Foreign Exchange
|
Interest
|
Foreign Exchange
|
(unaudited)
(millions of Canadian dollars, pre-tax)
|
2011
|
2010
|
2011
|
2010
|
2011
|
2010
|
2011
|
2010
|
2011
|
2010
|
Change in (losses)/gains on derivative instruments recognized in Other Comprehensive Income (effective portion)
|
(53)
|
(98)
|
(11)
|
(36)
|
(6)
|
13
|
-
|
(13)
|
68
|
85
|
Reclassification of gains/(losses) on derivative instruments from AOCI to earnings (effective portion)
|
29
|
(12)
|
28
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
9
|
13
|
-(1)
|
-(1)
|
(Losses)/gains on derivative instruments recognized in earnings (ineffective portion and amount excluded from effectiveness testing)
|
(2)
|
(8)
|
(1)
|
- |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-(2)
|
-(2)
|
(1) Location of gain/(loss) is Gain/(Loss) on Sale of Subsidiary
(2) Location of gain/(loss) is Other Income/(Expense)
Derivative contracts entered into to manage market risk often contain financial assurances provisions that allow parties to the contracts to manage credit risk. These provisions may require collateral to be provided if a credit-risk-related contingent event occurs, such as a downgrade in the Company’s credit rating to non-investment grade. Based on contracts in place and market prices at March 31, 2011, the aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that are in a net liability position was $86 million, for which the Company has provided collateral of $3 million in the normal course of business. If the credit-risk-related contingent features in these agreements were triggered on March 31, 2011, the Company would have been required to provide additional collateral of $83 million to its counterparties. Collateral may also need to be provided should the fair value of derivative instruments exceed pre-defined contractual exposure limit thresholds. The Company has sufficient liquidity in the form of cash and undrawn committed revolving bank lines to meet its contingent obligations should they arise.
Income Taxes
At March 31, 2011, the total unrecognized tax benefit of uncertain tax positions is approximately $65 million (December 31, 2010 - $62 million). TransCanada recognizes interest and penalties related to income tax uncertainties in income tax expense. Included in net tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2011 is $1 million of interest expense and nil for penalties (March 31, 2010 - $1 million for interest expense and nil for penalties). At March 31, 2011, the Company had $20 million accrued for interest expense and nil accrued for penalties (December 31, 2010 - $19 million accrued for interest expense and nil accrued for penalties).
TransCanada expects the enactment of certain Canadian Federal tax legislation in the next twelve months which is expected to result in a favourable income tax adjustment of approximately $18 million. Otherwise, subject to the results of audit examinations by taxing authorities and other legislative amendments, TransCanada does not anticipate further adjustments to the unrecognized tax benefits during the next twelve months that would have a material impact on its financial statements.
exhibit311tccq104292011.htm
Exhibit 31.1
Certifications
I, Russell K. Girling, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 6-K of TransCanada Corporation;
2.
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|
3.
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
|
4.
|
The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the issuer and have:
|
|
(a)
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
|
|
(b)
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
|
|
(c)
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
|
|
(d)
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and
|
5.
|
The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
|
|
(a)
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
|
|
(b)
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.
|
Dated:
|
April 29, 2011
|
/s/ Russell K. Girling
|
|
|
Russell K. Girling
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
exhibit312tccq104292011.htm
Exhibit 31.2
Certifications
I, Donald R. Marchand, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 6-K of TransCanada Corporation;
2.
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|
3.
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
|
4.
|
The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the issuer and have:
|
|
(a)
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
|
|
(b)
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
|
|
(c)
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
|
|
(d)
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and
|
5.
|
The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
|
|
(a)
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
|
|
(b)
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.
|
Dated:
|
April 29, 2011
|
/s/ Donald R. Marchand
|
|
|
Donald R. Marchand
|
|
|
Executive Vice-President and
Chief Financial Officer
|
exhibit321tccq104292011.htm
Exhibit 32.1
TRANSCANADA CORPORATION
450 – 1st Street S.W.
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
T2P 5H1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
I, Russell K. Girling, the Chief Executive Officer of TransCanada Corporation (the “Company”), in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify, in connection with the Company’s Quarterly Report as filed on Form 6-K for the period ended March 31, 2011 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), that:
1.
|
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|
2.
|
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
|
/s/ Russell K. Girling
|
|
Russell K. Girling
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
April 29, 2011
|
exhibit322tccq104292011.htm
Exhibit 32.2
TRANSCANADA CORPORATION
450 – 1st Street S.W.
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
T2P 5H1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
I, Donald R. Marchand, the Chief Financial Officer of TransCanada Corporation (the “Company”), in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify, in connection with the Company’s Quarterly Report as filed on Form 6-K for the period ended March 31, 2011 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), that:
1.
|
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|
2.
|
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
|
/s/ Donald R. Marchand
|
|
Donald R. Marchand
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
April 29, 2011
|
exhibit991tccq104292011.htm
Exhibit 99.1
TRANSCANADA CORPORATION – FIRST QUARTER 2011
Quarterly Report to Shareholders
TransCanada Reports 30 Per Cent Increase in First Quarter
Comparable Earnings to $425 Million, or $0.61 Per Share
CALGARY, Alberta – April 29, 2011 – TransCanada Corporation (TSX, NYSE: TRP) (TransCanada or the Company) today announced comparable earnings for first quarter 2011 of $425 million or $0.61 per share. Net income attributable to common shares was $415 million or $0.59 per share. TransCanada’s Board of Directors also declared a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per common share for the quarter ending June 30, 2011, equivalent to $1.68 per share on an annualized basis.
“Over the last year approximately $9 billion of new assets have commenced commercial operations and more recently our existing low-cost, base-load power assets have benefitted from higher power prices. Together, this contributed to a 30 per cent increase in comparable earnings for first quarter 2011 when compared to the same period last year,” said Russ Girling, TransCanada’s president and chief executive officer. “TransCanada’s strong first quarter financial results highlight our ability to generate significant earnings and cash flow from our growing portfolio of high-quality energy infrastructure assets.”
Girling added that TransCanada will continue to expand its portfolio of natural gas and crude oil pipelines, power generation plants and natural gas storage facilities in the future by advancing a number of projects. They include the Keystone U.S. Gulf Coast Expansion, the Guadalajara Pipeline project in Mexico, additional extensions and expansions of the Alberta System, the Bruce Power restart program in Ontario, the Coolidge Generating Station in Arizona and the Cartier Wind power project in Québec. Each is expected to generate long-term, sustainable earnings and cash flow as they are placed in service.
First Quarter Highlights
(All financial figures are unaudited and in Canadian dollars unless noted otherwise)
§
|
Comparable earnings of $425 million, an increase of 30 per cent
|
§
|
Comparable earnings per share of $0.61, an increase of 27 per cent
|
§
|
Comparable EBITDA of $1.225 billion, an increase of 22 per cent
|
§
|
Funds generated from operations of $919 million, an increase of 27 per cent
|
§
|
Net income attributable to common shares of $415 million or $0.59 per share
|
§
|
Common share dividend of $0.42 per share for the quarter ending June 30, 2011; Dividend Reinvestment and Share Purchase Plan share issuance from treasury to be ceased
|
§
|
Keystone Cushing Extension commenced commercial operations; nominal capacity increased to 591,000 barrels per day (Bbl/d)
|
§
|
In April 2011, announced agreements to sell a 25 per cent interest in each of Gas Transmission Northwest LLC and Bison Pipeline LLC to TC PipeLines, LP for US$605 million.
|
Comparable earnings for first quarter 2011 were $425 million ($0.61 per share) compared to $328 million ($0.48 per share) in the same period in 2010. The increase was primarily due to incremental earnings from recently commissioned assets including Keystone, Halton Hills, Bison, Groundbirch and the second phase of Kibby Wind. Also contributing to the year over year increase in earnings were higher power prices realized in Alberta, higher earnings from the Alberta System and lower Natural Gas Pipelines business development costs. Partially offsetting these increases were higher interest costs and a lower contribution from Natural Gas Storage.
TransCanada’s $20 billion capital program is approximately half complete and is expected to generate long-term growth in earnings, cash flows and dividends as projects commence operations.
Notable recent developments in Oil Pipelines, Natural Gas Pipelines, Energy and Corporate include:
Oil Pipelines:
·
|
The Keystone Pipeline System continued to safely deliver a secure, stable supply of crude oil to the U.S Midwest. In February, the Keystone Cushing Extension commenced commercial operations. It increased the system’s nominal capacity to 591,000 Bbl/d with contracted volumes of 530,000 Bbl/d.
|
TransCanada’s Keystone U.S. Gulf Coast Expansion is now entering the final stages of regulatory review. On April 15, 2011, the U.S. Department of State (DOS), the lead agency for U.S. federal regulatory approvals, issued a Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement (SDEIS) in response to comments received on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) issued in April 2010 and to address new and additional information received. The SDEIS provides additional information on key environmental issues, but does not change the conclusion reached in the DEIS that the project would enhance U.S. energy security, benefit the U.S. economy and would have a limited environmental impact.
The DOS has invited interested parties to comment on the SDEIS during a 45-day period which concludes June 6, 2011. Following receipt of comments on the SDEIS and subsequent publication of a Final Environmental Impact Statement, the DOS will consult with other U.S. federal agencies during a 90-day period to determine if granting approval for the U.S. Gulf Coast Expansion is in the national interest. The DOS has indicated it will make a final decision regarding the Presidential Permit prior to the end of 2011.
The Keystone U.S. Gulf Coast Expansion will play an important role in linking a secure and growing supply of western Canadian and U.S. Williston Basin crude oil with the largest refining markets in the U.S.
Natural Gas Pipelines:
·
|
Construction of the Horn River pipeline project started in March 2011. The $310 million project is scheduled to be operational in second quarter 2012 with commitments for contracted natural gas volumes rising to 634 million cubic feet per day (mmcf/d) by 2014.
|
The Company has also executed an agreement securing contractual support for a new project to connect 100 mmcf/d of new natural gas supply in northeastern B.C. by 2014 with volumes expected to increase to 300 mmcf/d by 2020. This project is expected to extend the Horn River pipeline by approximately 100 kilometres (km) (62 miles) and to have an estimated capital cost of $265 million.
In addition to the Horn River pipeline project, TransCanada continues to advance further pipeline development in B.C. and Alberta to transport new natural gas supplies. The Company has filed several applications with the National Energy Board (NEB) requesting approval of further expansions of the Alberta System to accommodate requests for additional natural gas transmission service throughout the northwest portion of the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin. The total aggregate capital cost of these expansion projects is estimated to be $475 million.
·
|
On February 24, 2011 the NEB approved TransCanada’s revised 2011 interim toll application for the Canadian Mainline effective March 1, 2011. The revised interim tolls are consistent with the existing 2007-2011 settlement with two adjustments that resulted in a lower revenue requirement and therefore lower interim tolls.
|
TransCanada is preparing an application to the NEB for approval of final rates for 2011, which is expected to be filed today. The Company has continued discussions with shippers and other stakeholders to develop a tolling arrangement for the next several years to enhance the competitiveness of the Canadian Mainline and the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin. Unfortunately, discussions have not resulted in such an arrangement and it appears that TransCanada will be filing a comprehensive application with the NEB later in 2011 to address tolls for 2012 and beyond.
Also in respect to the Canadian Mainline, a successful open season closed in January 2011 and resulted in executed precedent agreements to transport 230,000 gigajoules per day (GJ/d) of Marcellus shale gas to eastern markets. TransCanada has commenced another open season to respond to market interest in transporting additional Marcellus shale volumes on the Canadian Mainline. That open season closed on April 15, 2011 and is expected to result in the transportation of an additional 150,000 GJ/d to markets east of the Parkway delivery point near Hamilton, Ontario beginning November 1, 2013. Executed precedent agreements from these open seasons are expected to be used to support a facilities application that the Company plans to file with the NEB in third quarter 2011.
·
|
Construction of the 305 km (190 mile) Guadalajara Pipeline was 90 per cent complete as of mid-April 2011. The US $360 million project is expected to commence commercial operations late in the second quarter of 2011. In addition, TransCanada and the Comision Federal de Electricidad recently executed a contract to add a compressor station to the pipeline. This approximate US $60 million project is expected to be in service in early 2013.
|
·
|
The Alaska Pipeline Project team continues to work with shippers to resolve conditional bids received as part of the project's open season and is working toward the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission application deadline of October 2012.
|
·
|
In March 2011, the Mackenzie Gas Project received a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity from the NEB, marking the end of the federal regulatory process. The project proponents continue to seek the Canadian government’s support of an acceptable fiscal framework which would allow the project to progress. TransCanada remains committed to advancing the project.
|
·
|
On April 26, 2011, the Company announced it entered into agreements to sell a 25 per cent interest in each of Gas Transmission Northwest LLC (GTN) and Bison Pipeline LLC to TC PipeLines, LP for an aggregate purchase price of US$605 million, which includes US$81 million or 25 per cent of GTN’s debt. The sale is expected to close in May 2011 and is subject to certain closing conditions.
|
·
|
At the end of April, TC PipeLines, LP announced an underwritten public offering of 6,300,000 common units at US$47.58 per common unit. Gross proceeds of approximately US$300 million from this offering will be used to partially fund the acquisition. The underwriters were also granted a 30-day option to purchase an additional 945,000 common units at the same price. The offering is expected to close on May 3, 2011.
|
·
|
As part of this offering, TransCanada will make a capital contribution of US$6 million to maintain its two per cent general partnership interest in TC PipeLines, LP. Assuming the underwriters exercise their option to purchase additional units, TransCanada's ownership in TC PipeLines, LP is expected to be approximately 33.3 per cent.
|
Energy:
·
|
Construction of the 575 megawatt (MW) Coolidge Generating Station is complete. The US$500 million generating station is expected to enter commercial operation May 1, 2011. All of the power produced by the facility will be sold under a 20-year power purchase arrangement with the Salt River Project, a local Arizona utility.
|
·
|
Construction continues on the five-stage, 590 MW Cartier Wind project in Québec. The 58 MW Montagne-Sèche project and phase one of the Gros-Morne wind farm with 101 MW are expected to be operational in December 2011. The 111 MW Gros-Morne phase two is expected to be operational in December 2012. These are the fourth and fifth Québec-based wind farms of Cartier Wind, which are 62 per cent owned by TransCanada. All of the power produced by Cartier Wind is sold under a 20-year power purchase arrangement to Hydro-Québec.
|
·
|
Refurbishment work on Bruce A Units 1 and 2 continues with the connection of the refurbished Unit 2 reactor to plant systems. Plant commissioning is underway on Unit 2 and will accelerate in second quarter 2011 when construction activities are essentially complete. Fuel Channel Assembly (FCA) is underway on Unit 1, with completion expected in second quarter 2011. The installation of these FCAs is the final stage of Atomic Energy of Canada Limited's work on the reactors.
|
Subject to regulatory approval, Bruce Power expects to load fuel into Unit 2 in second quarter 2011 and achieve a first synchronization of the generator to the electrical grid by the end of 2011, with commercial operation expected to occur in first quarter 2012. Bruce Power expects to load fuel into Unit 1 in third quarter 2011, with a first synchronization of the generator during first quarter 2012 and commercial operation expected to occur during third quarter 2012. TransCanada's share of the total capital cost is expected to be approximately $2.4 billion, of which $2.1 billion had been incurred at March 31, 2011.
·
|
In December 2010, Sundance A Units 1 and 2 were withdrawn from service for testing and were subject to a force majeure claim by TransAlta Corporation (TransAlta) in January 2011. In February 2011, TransAlta notified TransCanada that it had determined it was uneconomic to replace or repair the Sundance 1 and 2 generating units and that the Sundance A PPA should therefore be terminated.
|
TransCanada does not agree with TransAlta’s determination on either the force majeure claim or the destruction claim and has disputed both matters under the binding dispute resolution process provided in the PPA. As the limited information TransCanada has received to date does not support these claims, TransCanada continues to record revenues and costs under the PPA as though this event was a normal plant outage.
·
|
The Board of Directors of TransCanada declared a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per common share for the quarter ending June 30, 2011 on TransCanada’s outstanding common shares. The quarterly amount is equivalent to $1.68 per common share on an annual basis.
|
·
|
Commencing with the dividends declared on April 28, 2011, common shares purchased with reinvested cash dividends under TransCanada’s Dividend Reinvestment and Share Purchase Plan (DRP) will no longer be satisfied with shares issued from Treasury at a discount but rather will be acquired on the Toronto Stock Exchange at 100 per cent of the weighted average purchase price. The DRP is available for dividends payable on TransCanada’s common and preferred shares, and TransCanada PipeLines Limited’s preferred shares.
|
·
|
TransCanada is well positioned to fund its existing capital program through its growing internally-generated cash flow, and its continued access to capital markets. TransCanada will also continue to examine opportunities for portfolio management, including an ongoing role for TC PipeLines, LP in financing its capital program.
|
Teleconference – Audio and Slide Presentation:
TransCanada will hold a teleconference and webcast to discuss its 2011 first quarter financial results. Russ Girling, TransCanada president and chief executive officer and Don Marchand, executive vice-president and chief financial officer, along with other members of the TransCanada executive leadership team, will discuss the financial results and company developments before opening the call to questions from analysts and members of the media.
Event:
TransCanada 2011 first quarter financial results teleconference and webcast
Date:
Friday, April 29, 2011
Time:
1 p.m. mountain daylight time (MDT) / 3 p.m. eastern daylight time (EDT)
How:
Analysts, members of the media and other interested parties are invited to participate by calling (866) 223-7781 or (416) 340-8018 (Toronto area). Please dial in 10 minutes prior to the start of the call. No pass code is required. A live webcast of the teleconference will be available at www.transcanada.com.
A replay of the teleconference will be available two hours after the conclusion of the call until midnight (EDT) May 6, 2011. Please call (800) 408-3053 or (905) 694-9451 (Toronto area) and enter pass code 5762531#.
With more than 60 years experience, TransCanada is a leader in the responsible development and reliable operation of North American energy infrastructure including natural gas and oil pipelines, power generation and gas storage facilities. TransCanada's network of wholly owned natural gas pipelines extends more than 60,000 kilometres (37,000 miles), tapping into virtually all major gas supply basins in North America. TransCanada is one of the continent's largest providers of gas storage and related services with approximately 380 billion cubic feet of storage capacity. A growing independent power producer, TransCanada owns, or has interests in, over 10,800 megawatts of power generation in Canada and the United States. TransCanada is developing one of North America's largest oil delivery systems. TransCanada's common shares trade on the Toronto and New York stock exchanges under the symbol TRP. For more information visit: www.transcanada.com.
Forward-Looking Information
This news release may contain certain information that is forward-looking and is subject to important risks and uncertainties. The words "anticipate", "expect", "believe", "may", "should", "estimate", "project", "outlook", "forecast" or other similar words are used to identify such forward-looking information. Forward-looking statements in this document are intended to provide TransCanada security holders and potential investors with information regarding TransCanada and its subsidiaries, including management’s assessment of TransCanada’s and its subsidiaries’ future financial and operational plans and outlook. Forward-looking statements in this document may include, among others, statements regarding the anticipated business prospects, projects and financial performance of TransCanada and its subsidiaries, expectations or projections about the future, strategies and goals for growth and expansion, expected and future cash flows, costs, schedules including anticipated construction and completion dates, operating and financial results and expected impact of future commitments and contingent liabilities. All forward-looking statements reflect TransCanada's beliefs and assumptions based on information available at the time the statements were made. Actual results or events may differ from those predicted in these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from current expectations include, among others, the ability of TransCanada to successfully implement its strategic initiatives and whether such strategic initiatives will yield the expected benefits, the operating performance of the Company's pipeline and energy assets, the availability and price of energy commodities, capacity payments, regulatory processes and decisions, changes in environmental and other laws and regulations, competitive factors in the pipeline and energy sectors, construction and completion of capital projects, labour, equipment and material costs, access to capital markets, interest and currency exchange rates, technological developments and economic conditions in North America. By its nature, forward-looking information is subject to various risks and uncertainties, which could cause TransCanada's actual results and experience to differ materially from the anticipated results or expectations expressed. Additional information on these and other factors is available in the reports filed by TransCanada with Canadian securities regulators and with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on this forward-looking information, which is given as of the date it is expressed in this news release or otherwise, and not to use future-oriented information or financial outlooks for anything other than their intended purpose. TransCanada undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.
Non-GAAP Measures
TransCanada uses the measures Comparable Earnings, Comparable Earnings per Share, Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA), Comparable EBITDA, Earnings Before Interest and Taxes (EBIT), Comparable EBIT, Comparable Interest Expense, Comparable Interest Income and Other, Comparable Income Taxes and Funds Generated from Operations in this news release. These measures do not have any standardized meaning prescribed by Canadian generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). They are, therefore, considered to be non-GAAP measures and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other entities. Management of TransCanada uses these non-GAAP measures to improve its ability to compare financial results among reporting periods and to enhance its understanding of operating performance, liquidity and ability to generate funds to finance operations. These non-GAAP measures are also provided to readers as additional information on TransCanada’s operating performance, liquidity and ability to generate funds to finance operations.
EBITDA is an approximate measure of the Company’s pre-tax operating cash flow and is generally used to better measure performance and evaluate trends of individual assets. EBITDA comprises earnings before deducting interest and other financial charges, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, net income attributable to non-controlling interests and preferred share dividends. EBIT is a measure of the Company’s earnings from ongoing operations and is generally used to better measure performance and evaluate trends within each segment. EBIT comprises earnings before deducting interest and other financial charges, income taxes, net income attributable to non-controlling interests and preferred share dividends.
Comparable Earnings, Comparable EBITDA, Comparable EBIT, Comparable Interest Expense, Comparable Interest Income and Other, and Comparable Income Taxes comprise Net Income Attributable to Common Shares, EBITDA, EBIT, Interest Expense, Interest Income and Other, and Income Taxes Expense, respectively, adjusted for specific items that are significant but are not reflective of the Company’s underlying operations in the period. Specific items are subjective, however, management uses its judgement and informed decision-making when identifying items to be excluded in calculating these non-GAAP measures, some of which may recur. Specific items may include but are not limited to certain fair value adjustments relating to risk management activities, income tax refunds and adjustments, gains or losses on sales of assets, legal and bankruptcy settlements, and write-downs of assets and investments.
The table in the Non-GAAP Measures section of the Management’s Discussion and Analysis presents a reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to Net Income Attributable to Common Shares. Comparable Earnings per Share is calculated by dividing Comparable Earnings by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period.
Funds Generated from Operations comprise Net Cash Provided by Operations before changes in operating working capital and allows management to better measure consolidated operating cash flow, excluding fluctuations from working capital balances which may not necessarily be reflective of underlying operations in the same period. A reconciliation of Funds Generated from Operations to Net Cash Provided by Operations is presented in the First Quarter 2011 Financial Highlights table in this news release.
-30-
Media Enquiries:
|
Terry Cunha/Shawn Howard
|
403.920-7859
800.608.7859
|
Analyst Enquiries:
|
David Moneta/Terry Hook/Lee Evans
|
403.920.7911
800.361.6522
|
First Quarter 2011 Financial Highlights
Operating Results
(unaudited)
|
Three months ended March 31
|
(millions of dollars)
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
2,243
|
|
|
1,955
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparable EBITDA(1)
|
1,225
|
|
|
1,001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Attributable to Controlling Interests
|
429
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Attributable to Common Shares
|
415
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparable Earnings(1)
|
425
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds generated from operations(1)
|
919
|
|
|
723
|
|
Decrease in operating working capital
|
90
|
|
|
109
|
|
Net cash provided by operations
|
1,009
|
|
|
832
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Expenditures
|
784
|
|
|
1,276
|
|
Common Share Statistics
|
|
Three months ended March 31
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income per Share - Basic
|
|
|
$0.59 |
|
|
|
$0.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparable Earnings per Share(1)
|
|
|
$0.61 |
|
|
|
$0.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends Declared per Share
|
|
|
$0.42 |
|
|
|
$0.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Common Shares Outstanding (millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average for the period
|
|
|
698 |
|
|
|
686 |
|
End of period
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
(1)
|
Refer to the Non-GAAP Measures section in this news release for further discussion of Comparable EBITDA, Comparable Earnings, Funds Generated from Operations and Comparable Earnings per Share.
|